Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Long-term ecosystem nitrogen limitation from foliar δ15N data and a land surface model

Caldararu, Silvia ; Thum, Tea ; Yu, Lin LU ; Kern, Melanie ; Nair, Richard and Zaehle, Sönke (2022) In Global Change Biology 28(2). p.493-508
Abstract

The effect of nutrient availability on plant growth and the terrestrial carbon sink under climate change and elevated CO2 remains one of the main uncertainties of the terrestrial carbon cycle. This is partially due to the difficulty of assessing nutrient limitation at large scales over long periods of time. Consistent declines in leaf nitrogen (N) content and leaf δ15N have been used to suggest that nitrogen limitation has increased in recent decades, most likely due to the concurrent increase in atmospheric CO2. However, such data sets are often not straightforward to interpret due to the complex factors that contribute to the spatial and temporal variation in leaf N and isotope concentration. We use... (More)

The effect of nutrient availability on plant growth and the terrestrial carbon sink under climate change and elevated CO2 remains one of the main uncertainties of the terrestrial carbon cycle. This is partially due to the difficulty of assessing nutrient limitation at large scales over long periods of time. Consistent declines in leaf nitrogen (N) content and leaf δ15N have been used to suggest that nitrogen limitation has increased in recent decades, most likely due to the concurrent increase in atmospheric CO2. However, such data sets are often not straightforward to interpret due to the complex factors that contribute to the spatial and temporal variation in leaf N and isotope concentration. We use the land surface model (LSM) QUINCY, which has the unique capacity to represent N isotopic processes, in conjunction with two large data sets of foliar N and N isotope content. We run the model with different scenarios to test whether foliar δ15N isotopic data can be used to infer large-scale N limitation and if the observed trends are caused by increasing atmospheric CO2, changes in climate or changes in sources and magnitude of anthropogenic N deposition. We show that while the model can capture the observed change in leaf N content and predict widespread increases in N limitation, it does not capture the pronounced, but very spatially heterogeneous, decrease in foliar δ15N observed in the data across the globe. The addition of an observation-based temporal trend in isotopic composition of N deposition leads to a more pronounced decrease in simulated leaf δ15N. Our results show that leaf δ15N observations cannot, on their own, be used to assess global-scale N limitation and that using such a data set in conjunction with an LSM can reveal the drivers behind the observed patterns.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
CO fertilization, land surface model, nitrogen, nitrogen deposition, nutrients, vegetation model
in
Global Change Biology
volume
28
issue
2
pages
493 - 508
publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
external identifiers
  • scopus:85117694050
  • pmid:34644449
ISSN
1354-1013
DOI
10.1111/gcb.15933
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
id
339c3182-9b70-431f-a204-045350c53a47
date added to LUP
2021-11-05 11:25:58
date last changed
2024-04-20 14:52:03
@article{339c3182-9b70-431f-a204-045350c53a47,
  abstract     = {{<p>The effect of nutrient availability on plant growth and the terrestrial carbon sink under climate change and elevated CO<sub>2</sub> remains one of the main uncertainties of the terrestrial carbon cycle. This is partially due to the difficulty of assessing nutrient limitation at large scales over long periods of time. Consistent declines in leaf nitrogen (N) content and leaf δ<sup>15</sup>N have been used to suggest that nitrogen limitation has increased in recent decades, most likely due to the concurrent increase in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>. However, such data sets are often not straightforward to interpret due to the complex factors that contribute to the spatial and temporal variation in leaf N and isotope concentration. We use the land surface model (LSM) QUINCY, which has the unique capacity to represent N isotopic processes, in conjunction with two large data sets of foliar N and N isotope content. We run the model with different scenarios to test whether foliar δ<sup>15</sup>N isotopic data can be used to infer large-scale N limitation and if the observed trends are caused by increasing atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, changes in climate or changes in sources and magnitude of anthropogenic N deposition. We show that while the model can capture the observed change in leaf N content and predict widespread increases in N limitation, it does not capture the pronounced, but very spatially heterogeneous, decrease in foliar δ<sup>15</sup>N observed in the data across the globe. The addition of an observation-based temporal trend in isotopic composition of N deposition leads to a more pronounced decrease in simulated leaf δ<sup>15</sup>N. Our results show that leaf δ<sup>15</sup>N observations cannot, on their own, be used to assess global-scale N limitation and that using such a data set in conjunction with an LSM can reveal the drivers behind the observed patterns.</p>}},
  author       = {{Caldararu, Silvia and Thum, Tea and Yu, Lin and Kern, Melanie and Nair, Richard and Zaehle, Sönke}},
  issn         = {{1354-1013}},
  keywords     = {{CO fertilization; land surface model; nitrogen; nitrogen deposition; nutrients; vegetation model}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{493--508}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
  series       = {{Global Change Biology}},
  title        = {{Long-term ecosystem nitrogen limitation from foliar δ<sup>15</sup>N data and a land surface model}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15933}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/gcb.15933}},
  volume       = {{28}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}