Freedom Fit for a Feminist? On the Feminist Potential of Quentin Skinner's Conception of Republican Freedom
(2014) In Redescriptions: Yearbook of Political Thought and Conceptual History 17(1). p.86-103- Abstract
 - The aim of this paper is to make it credible that there are feminist reasons for being a republican about freedom. In focus is Quentin Skinner’s conception of republican, or “neo-Roman”, freedom. Republican theory in history has not excelled in making poverty, gender hierarchy, and racism within the republic into main sources of concern. So can there be a radical republican theory of liberty fit for a feminist, to make sense of arbitrary power in the every day life of work, households, and local communities, where power is vague and unorganized? Proceeding from three questions – What does freedom mean? Under what circumstances does the issue arise? Why should we care? – I argue that in a feminist republicanism the lived experience of the... (More)
 - The aim of this paper is to make it credible that there are feminist reasons for being a republican about freedom. In focus is Quentin Skinner’s conception of republican, or “neo-Roman”, freedom. Republican theory in history has not excelled in making poverty, gender hierarchy, and racism within the republic into main sources of concern. So can there be a radical republican theory of liberty fit for a feminist, to make sense of arbitrary power in the every day life of work, households, and local communities, where power is vague and unorganized? Proceeding from three questions – What does freedom mean? Under what circumstances does the issue arise? Why should we care? – I argue that in a feminist republicanism the lived experience of the unfree will have primary and not, as Skinner now suggests, secondary importance. A feminist republican will be particularly concerned not only with what unfreedom is but with what it is like. (Less)
 
    Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
    https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4391548
- author
 - 						Halldenius, Lena
				LU
				
	 - organization
 - publishing date
 - 2014
 - type
 - Contribution to journal
 - publication status
 - published
 - subject
 - keywords
 - feminism, republicanism, freedom, institutional circumstance, lived experience, arbitrary power, citizen, Quentin Skinner
 - in
 - Redescriptions: Yearbook of Political Thought and Conceptual History
 - volume
 - 17
 - issue
 - 1
 - pages
 - 86 - 103
 - publisher
 - Helsinki University Press
 - DOI
 - 10.7227/R.17.1.5
 - language
 - English
 - LU publication?
 - yes
 - id
 - 3559c6f7-8f6a-4c8d-b80f-223ae34e29e5 (old id 4391548)
 - alternative location
 - http://manchester.metapress.com/content/122826/
 - date added to LUP
 - 2016-04-01 11:09:19
 - date last changed
 - 2025-04-04 14:14:40
 
@article{3559c6f7-8f6a-4c8d-b80f-223ae34e29e5,
  abstract     = {{The aim of this paper is to make it credible that there are feminist reasons for being a republican about freedom. In focus is Quentin Skinner’s conception of republican, or “neo-Roman”, freedom. Republican theory in history has not excelled in making poverty, gender hierarchy, and racism within the republic into main sources of concern. So can there be a radical republican theory of liberty fit for a feminist, to make sense of arbitrary power in the every day life of work, households, and local communities, where power is vague and unorganized? Proceeding from three questions – What does freedom mean? Under what circumstances does the issue arise? Why should we care? – I argue that in a feminist republicanism the lived experience of the unfree will have primary and not, as Skinner now suggests, secondary importance. A feminist republican will be particularly concerned not only with what unfreedom is but with what it is like.}},
  author       = {{Halldenius, Lena}},
  keywords     = {{feminism; republicanism; freedom; institutional circumstance; lived experience; arbitrary power; citizen; Quentin Skinner}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{86--103}},
  publisher    = {{Helsinki University Press}},
  series       = {{Redescriptions: Yearbook of Political Thought and Conceptual History}},
  title        = {{Freedom Fit for a Feminist? On the Feminist Potential of Quentin Skinner's Conception of Republican Freedom}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/R.17.1.5}},
  doi          = {{10.7227/R.17.1.5}},
  volume       = {{17}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}