Advanced

Knowing work - Cultivating a practice-based epistemology of knowledge in organization studies

Rennstam, Jens LU and Ashcraft, Karen (2014) In Human Relations 67(1). p.3-25
Abstract
While knowledge theorists urge attention to knowing in practice, two common habits in the empirical literature, which we call knowledge inherency and skepticism, function to re-center certain practitioners. The sites in which we study knowing thereby remain limited, hindering a fuller practice turn. We argue that this enduring tendency is problematic because it inhibits our understanding of ‘communicative knowledge’—a form of knowing central to the contemporary economy. Yet communicative knowledge is persistently relegated to secondary status through a logic that is simultaneously gendered and classed. We thus suggest a more thorough shift toward the study of ‘knowledge in work’ (Thompson et al, 2001), wherein such a priori associations... (More)
While knowledge theorists urge attention to knowing in practice, two common habits in the empirical literature, which we call knowledge inherency and skepticism, function to re-center certain practitioners. The sites in which we study knowing thereby remain limited, hindering a fuller practice turn. We argue that this enduring tendency is problematic because it inhibits our understanding of ‘communicative knowledge’—a form of knowing central to the contemporary economy. Yet communicative knowledge is persistently relegated to secondary status through a logic that is simultaneously gendered and classed. We thus suggest a more thorough shift toward the study of ‘knowledge in work’ (Thompson et al, 2001), wherein such a priori associations are suspended, and all practitioners de-centered, in the interest of understanding specific forms, systems, and relations of knowledge entailed in situated practices of knowing. The second half of the paper develops specific empirical strategies for doing so. The strategies are meant to enable grounded analysis of knowing practices in various lines of work to interrogate how these may be different to practices we are more familiar with, as well as inquiry into similarities between these familiar practices and new ones in order to destabilize the link between knowledge and certain practitioners. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
class , communicative knowledge , gender , knowing , knowledge work , practice
in
Human Relations
volume
67
issue
1
pages
3 - 25
publisher
SAGE Publications Inc.
external identifiers
  • wos:000328727300001
  • scopus:84890942104
ISSN
0018-7267
DOI
10.1177/0018726713484182
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
d6a65913-28ea-49d3-a472-5fd92f5f124e (old id 3615502)
date added to LUP
2013-03-21 08:13:29
date last changed
2017-10-29 03:22:51
@article{d6a65913-28ea-49d3-a472-5fd92f5f124e,
  abstract     = {While knowledge theorists urge attention to knowing in practice, two common habits in the empirical literature, which we call knowledge inherency and skepticism, function to re-center certain practitioners. The sites in which we study knowing thereby remain limited, hindering a fuller practice turn. We argue that this enduring tendency is problematic because it inhibits our understanding of ‘communicative knowledge’—a form of knowing central to the contemporary economy. Yet communicative knowledge is persistently relegated to secondary status through a logic that is simultaneously gendered and classed. We thus suggest a more thorough shift toward the study of ‘knowledge in work’ (Thompson et al, 2001), wherein such a priori associations are suspended, and all practitioners de-centered, in the interest of understanding specific forms, systems, and relations of knowledge entailed in situated practices of knowing. The second half of the paper develops specific empirical strategies for doing so. The strategies are meant to enable grounded analysis of knowing practices in various lines of work to interrogate how these may be different to practices we are more familiar with, as well as inquiry into similarities between these familiar practices and new ones in order to destabilize the link between knowledge and certain practitioners.},
  author       = {Rennstam, Jens and Ashcraft, Karen},
  issn         = {0018-7267},
  keyword      = {class   ,communicative knowledge    ,gender     ,knowing    ,knowledge work     ,practice},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {3--25},
  publisher    = {SAGE Publications Inc.},
  series       = {Human Relations},
  title        = {Knowing work - Cultivating a practice-based epistemology of knowledge in organization studies},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726713484182},
  volume       = {67},
  year         = {2014},
}