Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Event topology classifiers at the Large Hadron Collider

Prasad, Suraj ; Tripathy, Sushanta LU orcid ; Sahoo, Bhagyarathi and Sahoo, Raghunath (2026) In Physics Reports 1181. p.1-75
Abstract

Event classifiers are the most fundamental observables to probe the event topology of hadronic and nuclear collisions at relativistic energies. Over the last five decades, significant progress has been made to establish suitable event classifiers to probe different physics processes occurring in elementary (Formula presented) to heavy-ion collisions in a broad range of center of mass energies. One of the major motivations to revisit event classifiers at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) originates from the recent measurements of high multiplicity proton–proton collisions, which have revealed that these small collision systems exhibit features similar to the formation of quark–gluon plasma (QGP), traditionally believed to be only... (More)

Event classifiers are the most fundamental observables to probe the event topology of hadronic and nuclear collisions at relativistic energies. Over the last five decades, significant progress has been made to establish suitable event classifiers to probe different physics processes occurring in elementary (Formula presented) to heavy-ion collisions in a broad range of center of mass energies. One of the major motivations to revisit event classifiers at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) originates from the recent measurements of high multiplicity proton–proton collisions, which have revealed that these small collision systems exhibit features similar to the formation of quark–gluon plasma (QGP), traditionally believed to be only achievable in heavy nucleus–nucleus collisions at ultra-relativistic energies. To pinpoint the origin of these QGP-like phenomena with substantially reduced autocorrelation and selection biases, and to bring all collision systems on equal footing, along with charged-particle multiplicity, lately several event topology classifiers such as transverse sphericity, transverse spherocity, relative transverse activity classifier, and charged-particle flattenicity have been used extensively in experiments as well as in the phenomenological front. In addition, the infrared and collinear safety of event-shape observables makes them ideal for precision studies of jets and heavy-flavors at the LHC. In this review article, we summarize the motivation, scope, and practical use of these event-shape observables. The discussion integrates results and insights from all major LHC experiments, setting the stage for precision investigations for Run 3, Run 4, and future high luminosity upgrades of the LHC. In most cases, the event shape observables are found to be better probes in understanding the heavy-ion-like behavior seen at the LHC, while making a multi-differential study of multihadron production dynamics in hadronic and nuclear collisions.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Event shape, Large Hadron Collider, Quark–gluon plasma, Ultra-relativistic collisions
in
Physics Reports
volume
1181
pages
75 pages
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:105036241522
ISSN
0370-1573
DOI
10.1016/j.physrep.2026.04.001
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
374329ca-5cab-4d57-ab94-87dd98f5af63
date added to LUP
2026-06-26 10:27:06
date last changed
2026-06-26 10:28:15
@article{374329ca-5cab-4d57-ab94-87dd98f5af63,
  abstract     = {{<p>Event classifiers are the most fundamental observables to probe the event topology of hadronic and nuclear collisions at relativistic energies. Over the last five decades, significant progress has been made to establish suitable event classifiers to probe different physics processes occurring in elementary (Formula presented) to heavy-ion collisions in a broad range of center of mass energies. One of the major motivations to revisit event classifiers at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) originates from the recent measurements of high multiplicity proton–proton collisions, which have revealed that these small collision systems exhibit features similar to the formation of quark–gluon plasma (QGP), traditionally believed to be only achievable in heavy nucleus–nucleus collisions at ultra-relativistic energies. To pinpoint the origin of these QGP-like phenomena with substantially reduced autocorrelation and selection biases, and to bring all collision systems on equal footing, along with charged-particle multiplicity, lately several event topology classifiers such as transverse sphericity, transverse spherocity, relative transverse activity classifier, and charged-particle flattenicity have been used extensively in experiments as well as in the phenomenological front. In addition, the infrared and collinear safety of event-shape observables makes them ideal for precision studies of jets and heavy-flavors at the LHC. In this review article, we summarize the motivation, scope, and practical use of these event-shape observables. The discussion integrates results and insights from all major LHC experiments, setting the stage for precision investigations for Run 3, Run 4, and future high luminosity upgrades of the LHC. In most cases, the event shape observables are found to be better probes in understanding the heavy-ion-like behavior seen at the LHC, while making a multi-differential study of multihadron production dynamics in hadronic and nuclear collisions.</p>}},
  author       = {{Prasad, Suraj and Tripathy, Sushanta and Sahoo, Bhagyarathi and Sahoo, Raghunath}},
  issn         = {{0370-1573}},
  keywords     = {{Event shape; Large Hadron Collider; Quark–gluon plasma; Ultra-relativistic collisions}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{1--75}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Physics Reports}},
  title        = {{Event topology classifiers at the Large Hadron Collider}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2026.04.001}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.physrep.2026.04.001}},
  volume       = {{1181}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}