Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Authors’ reply to Fell

Mulinari, Shai LU and Ozieranski, Piotr (2023) In British Medical Journal 383.
Abstract
Fell, from the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), the self-regulatory body of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), agrees with our overarching point that healthcare professionals and organisations have an important role in responding to any formal sanctions that are applied by the PMCPA and ABPI.12 For healthcare professionals and organisations to able to respond, however, they need more information about what the companies breaching the ABPI code have done. We therefore look forward to the PMPCA considering our suggestions to improve transparency by making its audits publicly available and by requiring companies that are publicly reprimanded by authority to inform their collaborators about... (More)
Fell, from the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), the self-regulatory body of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), agrees with our overarching point that healthcare professionals and organisations have an important role in responding to any formal sanctions that are applied by the PMCPA and ABPI.12 For healthcare professionals and organisations to able to respond, however, they need more information about what the companies breaching the ABPI code have done. We therefore look forward to the PMPCA considering our suggestions to improve transparency by making its audits publicly available and by requiring companies that are publicly reprimanded by authority to inform their collaborators about the offences and any remedial action taken.

Fell sees the increasing number of breaches of the ABPI code ruled over time as a positive development, as it “shows that people feel confident using the self-regulatory system to raise concerns.” Although this interpretation is certainly possible, the obvious counterpoint is that the increasing number of breaches primarily shows that many companies are engaging in unethical marketing, which can hardly be seen as positive.

Furthermore, although some people exposed to unethical marketing do submit complaints to the PMCPA, most do not, as we point out in our article. In other words, there is most likely a large under-reporting to the PMCPA. In addition, people might be submitting complaints to the PMCPA just because it is the only way to complain about company misbehaviour (as the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency strongly encourages people to complain to the PMCPA).

Finally, although it is true that the total number of complaints from individuals to the PMCPA has gone up in recent years, a detailed breakdown shows a very marked decrease in complaints from competing drug companies. It would be concerning if this was because companies do not feel confident in using their own self-regulatory system to raise concerns. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
British Medical Journal
volume
383
article number
p2493
publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
external identifiers
  • scopus:85175770117
  • pmid:37914189
ISSN
1756-1833
DOI
10.1136/bmj.p2493
project
Following the money: cross-national study of pharmaceutical industry payments to medical associations and patient organisations
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
380ed64f-d223-47ec-9137-86f64f52d7fc
date added to LUP
2023-11-05 21:31:40
date last changed
2023-12-05 03:00:10
@article{380ed64f-d223-47ec-9137-86f64f52d7fc,
  abstract     = {{Fell, from the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), the self-regulatory body of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), agrees with our overarching point that healthcare professionals and organisations have an important role in responding to any formal sanctions that are applied by the PMCPA and ABPI.12 For healthcare professionals and organisations to able to respond, however, they need more information about what the companies breaching the ABPI code have done. We therefore look forward to the PMPCA considering our suggestions to improve transparency by making its audits publicly available and by requiring companies that are publicly reprimanded by authority to inform their collaborators about the offences and any remedial action taken.<br/><br/>Fell sees the increasing number of breaches of the ABPI code ruled over time as a positive development, as it “shows that people feel confident using the self-regulatory system to raise concerns.” Although this interpretation is certainly possible, the obvious counterpoint is that the increasing number of breaches primarily shows that many companies are engaging in unethical marketing, which can hardly be seen as positive.<br/><br/>Furthermore, although some people exposed to unethical marketing do submit complaints to the PMCPA, most do not, as we point out in our article. In other words, there is most likely a large under-reporting to the PMCPA. In addition, people might be submitting complaints to the PMCPA just because it is the only way to complain about company misbehaviour (as the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency strongly encourages people to complain to the PMCPA).<br/><br/>Finally, although it is true that the total number of complaints from individuals to the PMCPA has gone up in recent years, a detailed breakdown shows a very marked decrease in complaints from competing drug companies. It would be concerning if this was because companies do not feel confident in using their own self-regulatory system to raise concerns.}},
  author       = {{Mulinari, Shai and Ozieranski, Piotr}},
  issn         = {{1756-1833}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{11}},
  publisher    = {{BMJ Publishing Group}},
  series       = {{British Medical Journal}},
  title        = {{Authors’ reply to Fell}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p2493}},
  doi          = {{10.1136/bmj.p2493}},
  volume       = {{383}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}