Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

NIKE: a new clinical tool for establishing levels of indications for cataract surgery

Lundstrom, Mats ; Albrecht, Susanne ; Håkansson, Ingemar LU ; Lorefors, Ragnhild ; Ohlsson, Sven ; Polland, Werner ; Schmid, Andrea ; Svensson, Goran and Wendel, Eva (2006) In Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 84(4). p.495-501
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to construct a new clinical tool for establishing levels of indications for cataract surgery, and to validate this tool. Methods: Teams from nine eye clinics reached an agreement about the need to develop a clinical tool for setting levels of indications for cataract surgery and about the items that should be included in the tool. The tool was to be called 'NIKE' (Nationell Indikationsmodell for Kataraktextraktion). The Canadian Cataract Priority Criteria Tool served as a model for the NIKE tool, which was modified for Swedish conditions. Items included in the tool were visual acuity of both eyes, patients' perceived difficulties in day-to-day life, cataract symptoms, the ability to live... (More)
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to construct a new clinical tool for establishing levels of indications for cataract surgery, and to validate this tool. Methods: Teams from nine eye clinics reached an agreement about the need to develop a clinical tool for setting levels of indications for cataract surgery and about the items that should be included in the tool. The tool was to be called 'NIKE' (Nationell Indikationsmodell for Kataraktextraktion). The Canadian Cataract Priority Criteria Tool served as a model for the NIKE tool, which was modified for Swedish conditions. Items included in the tool were visual acuity of both eyes, patients' perceived difficulties in day-to-day life, cataract symptoms, the ability to live independently, and medical/ophthalmic reasons for surgery. The tool was validated and tested in 343 cataract surgery patients. Validity, stability and reliability were tested and the outcome of surgery was studied in relation to the indication setting. Results: Four indication groups (IGs) were suggested. The group with the greatest indications for surgery was named group 1 and that with the lowest, group 4. Validity was proved to be good. Surgery had the greatest impact on the group with the highest indications for surgery. Test-retest reliability test and interexaminer tests of indication settings showed statistically significant intraclass correlations (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] 0.526 and 0.923, respectively). Conclusions: A new clinical tool for indication setting in cataract surgery is presented. This tool, the NIKE, takes into account both visual acuity and the patient's perceived problems in day-to-day life because of cataract. The tool seems to be stable and reliable and neutral towards different examiners. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
reliability, validity, clinical tool, outcome, priority, cataract extraction, indication
in
Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica
volume
84
issue
4
pages
495 - 501
publisher
Wiley
external identifiers
  • pmid:16879570
  • wos:000239762100008
  • scopus:33746310627
  • pmid:16879570
ISSN
1395-3907
DOI
10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00707.x
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
40a37c59-f538-4cbe-9e2e-28005d8c2337 (old id 397605)
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 15:21:20
date last changed
2022-01-28 04:54:16
@article{40a37c59-f538-4cbe-9e2e-28005d8c2337,
  abstract     = {{Purpose: The purpose of this study was to construct a new clinical tool for establishing levels of indications for cataract surgery, and to validate this tool. Methods: Teams from nine eye clinics reached an agreement about the need to develop a clinical tool for setting levels of indications for cataract surgery and about the items that should be included in the tool. The tool was to be called 'NIKE' (Nationell Indikationsmodell for Kataraktextraktion). The Canadian Cataract Priority Criteria Tool served as a model for the NIKE tool, which was modified for Swedish conditions. Items included in the tool were visual acuity of both eyes, patients' perceived difficulties in day-to-day life, cataract symptoms, the ability to live independently, and medical/ophthalmic reasons for surgery. The tool was validated and tested in 343 cataract surgery patients. Validity, stability and reliability were tested and the outcome of surgery was studied in relation to the indication setting. Results: Four indication groups (IGs) were suggested. The group with the greatest indications for surgery was named group 1 and that with the lowest, group 4. Validity was proved to be good. Surgery had the greatest impact on the group with the highest indications for surgery. Test-retest reliability test and interexaminer tests of indication settings showed statistically significant intraclass correlations (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] 0.526 and 0.923, respectively). Conclusions: A new clinical tool for indication setting in cataract surgery is presented. This tool, the NIKE, takes into account both visual acuity and the patient's perceived problems in day-to-day life because of cataract. The tool seems to be stable and reliable and neutral towards different examiners.}},
  author       = {{Lundstrom, Mats and Albrecht, Susanne and Håkansson, Ingemar and Lorefors, Ragnhild and Ohlsson, Sven and Polland, Werner and Schmid, Andrea and Svensson, Goran and Wendel, Eva}},
  issn         = {{1395-3907}},
  keywords     = {{reliability; validity; clinical tool; outcome; priority; cataract extraction; indication}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{495--501}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  series       = {{Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica}},
  title        = {{NIKE: a new clinical tool for establishing levels of indications for cataract surgery}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00707.x}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00707.x}},
  volume       = {{84}},
  year         = {{2006}},
}