A pre-specified model based on four kallikrein markers in blood improves predictions of adverse pathology and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
(2020) In British Journal of Cancer 123(4). p.604-609- Abstract
Background: A pre-specified model based on four kallikrein markers in blood, commercially available as 4Kscore, predicts Gleason Grade (GG) 3 + 4 or higher prostate cancer on biopsy. However, sampling error and variation in pathology reporting may miss aggressive disease. Methods: The 4Kscore was measured in cryopreserved blood from 2330 men obtained before prostatectomy at a single institution between 2002 and 2010. Adverse surgical pathology and biochemical recurrence (BCR) were pre-specified to be assessed in all men, biopsy GG 3 + 3, and 3 + 4. Results: Adjusted for established clinical predictors, the 4Kscore was significantly associated with adverse pathology (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.32, 1.67; p < 0.0001). Adding 4Kscore increased... (More)
Background: A pre-specified model based on four kallikrein markers in blood, commercially available as 4Kscore, predicts Gleason Grade (GG) 3 + 4 or higher prostate cancer on biopsy. However, sampling error and variation in pathology reporting may miss aggressive disease. Methods: The 4Kscore was measured in cryopreserved blood from 2330 men obtained before prostatectomy at a single institution between 2002 and 2010. Adverse surgical pathology and biochemical recurrence (BCR) were pre-specified to be assessed in all men, biopsy GG 3 + 3, and 3 + 4. Results: Adjusted for established clinical predictors, the 4Kscore was significantly associated with adverse pathology (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.32, 1.67; p < 0.0001). Adding 4Kscore increased discrimination from (AUC) 0.672 to 0.718 and 0.644 to 0.659 within biopsy GG 3 + 3 and 3 + 4, respectively. Higher 4Kscore was associated with higher risk of BCR (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06, 1.26; p = 0.001). Adding 4Kscore improved the prediction of BCR (C-index 0.630–0.660) within GG 3 + 3, but not GG 3 + 4. Conclusions: The 4Kscore can help guide the clinical decision whether additional risk assessment—such as confirmatory biopsy—is needed to decide between active surveillance versus curative therapy. Evidence that the panel could influence management in biopsy GG 3 + 4 is less strong and requires further investigation.
(Less)
- author
- organization
- publishing date
- 2020-08-18
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- British Journal of Cancer
- volume
- 123
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 6 pages
- publisher
- Nature Publishing Group
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85085488493
- pmid:32467601
- ISSN
- 0007-0920
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41416-020-0914-7
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 3a069f31-81a6-4b2c-8410-a4626ccea77d
- date added to LUP
- 2020-06-16 14:23:15
- date last changed
- 2024-10-03 03:23:53
@article{3a069f31-81a6-4b2c-8410-a4626ccea77d, abstract = {{<p>Background: A pre-specified model based on four kallikrein markers in blood, commercially available as 4Kscore, predicts Gleason Grade (GG) 3 + 4 or higher prostate cancer on biopsy. However, sampling error and variation in pathology reporting may miss aggressive disease. Methods: The 4Kscore was measured in cryopreserved blood from 2330 men obtained before prostatectomy at a single institution between 2002 and 2010. Adverse surgical pathology and biochemical recurrence (BCR) were pre-specified to be assessed in all men, biopsy GG 3 + 3, and 3 + 4. Results: Adjusted for established clinical predictors, the 4Kscore was significantly associated with adverse pathology (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.32, 1.67; p < 0.0001). Adding 4Kscore increased discrimination from (AUC) 0.672 to 0.718 and 0.644 to 0.659 within biopsy GG 3 + 3 and 3 + 4, respectively. Higher 4Kscore was associated with higher risk of BCR (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06, 1.26; p = 0.001). Adding 4Kscore improved the prediction of BCR (C-index 0.630–0.660) within GG 3 + 3, but not GG 3 + 4. Conclusions: The 4Kscore can help guide the clinical decision whether additional risk assessment—such as confirmatory biopsy—is needed to decide between active surveillance versus curative therapy. Evidence that the panel could influence management in biopsy GG 3 + 4 is less strong and requires further investigation.</p>}}, author = {{Haese, Alexander and Tin, Amy L. and Carlsson, Sigrid V. and Sjoberg, Daniel D. and Pehrke, Dirk and Steuber, Thomas and Huland, Hartwig and Graefen, Markus and Scardino, Peter T. and Schlomm, Thorsten and Vickers, Andrew J. and Lilja, Hans and Sauter, Guido}}, issn = {{0007-0920}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{08}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{604--609}}, publisher = {{Nature Publishing Group}}, series = {{British Journal of Cancer}}, title = {{A pre-specified model based on four kallikrein markers in blood improves predictions of adverse pathology and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0914-7}}, doi = {{10.1038/s41416-020-0914-7}}, volume = {{123}}, year = {{2020}}, }