Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework : Tensions and prospects
(2022) In One Earth 5(3). p.252-264- Abstract
The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a “relational turn” in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although “inclusivity” is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational turn in biodiversity conservation. Drawing on global case examples applying multiple methods of inclusive conservation, we then demonstrate that, by actively engaging in the interdependent phases of recognizing hybridity, enabling conditions for reflexivity and partnership building, tensions can not... (More)
The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a “relational turn” in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although “inclusivity” is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational turn in biodiversity conservation. Drawing on global case examples applying multiple methods of inclusive conservation, we then demonstrate that, by actively engaging in the interdependent phases of recognizing hybridity, enabling conditions for reflexivity and partnership building, tensions can not only be acknowledged but softened and, in some cases, reframed when managing for biodiversity, equity, and justice goals. The results can improve stakeholder engagement in protected area management, ultimately supporting better implementation of global biodiversity targets.
(Less)
- author
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022-03-18
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- biodiversity conservation, ecosystem services, equity, inclusive conservation, plural valuation, protected area management, values
- in
- One Earth
- volume
- 5
- issue
- 3
- pages
- 252 - 264
- publisher
- Cell Press
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85126608408
- ISSN
- 2590-3330
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 3b4931c9-e8d0-4916-bf83-58f7630f2d2b
- date added to LUP
- 2022-06-09 10:33:47
- date last changed
- 2022-06-09 10:33:47
@article{3b4931c9-e8d0-4916-bf83-58f7630f2d2b,
abstract = {{<p>The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a “relational turn” in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although “inclusivity” is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational turn in biodiversity conservation. Drawing on global case examples applying multiple methods of inclusive conservation, we then demonstrate that, by actively engaging in the interdependent phases of recognizing hybridity, enabling conditions for reflexivity and partnership building, tensions can not only be acknowledged but softened and, in some cases, reframed when managing for biodiversity, equity, and justice goals. The results can improve stakeholder engagement in protected area management, ultimately supporting better implementation of global biodiversity targets.</p>}},
author = {{Raymond, Christopher M. and Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A. and Andersson, Erik and Andrade, Riley and Schnell, Alberto Arroyo and Battioni Romanelli, Barbara and Filyushkina, Anna and Goodson, Devin J. and Horcea-Milcu, Andra and Johnson, Dana N. and Keller, Rose and Kuiper, Jan J. and Lo, Veronica and López-Rodríguez, María D. and March, Hug and Metzger, Marc and Oteros-Rozas, Elisa and Salcido, Evan and Sellberg, My and Stewart, William and Ruiz-Mallén, Isabel and Plieninger, Tobias and van Riper, Carena J. and Verburg, Peter H. and Wiedermann, Magdalena M.}},
issn = {{2590-3330}},
keywords = {{biodiversity conservation; ecosystem services; equity; inclusive conservation; plural valuation; protected area management; values}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{03}},
number = {{3}},
pages = {{252--264}},
publisher = {{Cell Press}},
series = {{One Earth}},
title = {{Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework : Tensions and prospects}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008}},
volume = {{5}},
year = {{2022}},
}