Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Hvor ‘Each’ Reciprocals and Distributives in Icelandic : E-Raising + Short Main Verb Movement

Sigurosson, Halldór Ármann LU ; Wood, Jim and Sigurosson, Einar Freyr (2022) In Linguistic Inquiry 53(3). p.571-588
Abstract

We discuss remarkable constructions in Icelandic that have the distributive pronoun hvor ‘each’ in common: the reciprocal construction hvor annar ‘each other’, and the distributive construction hvor sinn ‘each their’, which also comes in a sinn hvor ‘their each’ version. We provide the first detailed description of these constructions, in particular their case and word order properties, which raise recalcitrant puzzles, and then we discuss what they say about the syntax of nonfinite verbs. Specifically, the word order and case properties of these constructions indicate that nonfinite verbs in Icelandic undergo short verb movement within the verb phrase. That is, the evidence indicates that the leftmost element in these constructions,... (More)

We discuss remarkable constructions in Icelandic that have the distributive pronoun hvor ‘each’ in common: the reciprocal construction hvor annar ‘each other’, and the distributive construction hvor sinn ‘each their’, which also comes in a sinn hvor ‘their each’ version. We provide the first detailed description of these constructions, in particular their case and word order properties, which raise recalcitrant puzzles, and then we discuss what they say about the syntax of nonfinite verbs. Specifically, the word order and case properties of these constructions indicate that nonfinite verbs in Icelandic undergo short verb movement within the verb phrase. That is, the evidence indicates that the leftmost element in these constructions, alternatively hvor or sinn, originates inside an object DP and moves, by what we call e-raising, to the base position of an antecedent with which it agrees, before being stranded by that very antecedent. Nevertheless, the verb appears to the left of this element, even when it is a nonfinite verb, showing that it must undergo short movement to the left of Spec,vP. In addition, the interaction of e-raising and case has important consequences for Case theory, as it indicates that case agreement and case marking take place in PF.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
case, distributives, e-raising, Icelandic, reciprocals, short verb movement, word order, ‘each’
in
Linguistic Inquiry
volume
53
issue
3
pages
18 pages
publisher
MIT Press
external identifiers
  • scopus:85133799143
ISSN
0024-3892
DOI
10.1162/ling_a_00411
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Publisher Copyright: © 2020 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
id
3d3bea61-de3d-4518-88f1-f18ffea92a0f
date added to LUP
2022-09-02 12:09:29
date last changed
2022-09-02 12:09:29
@article{3d3bea61-de3d-4518-88f1-f18ffea92a0f,
  abstract     = {{<p>We discuss remarkable constructions in Icelandic that have the distributive pronoun hvor ‘each’ in common: the reciprocal construction hvor annar ‘each other’, and the distributive construction hvor sinn ‘each their’, which also comes in a sinn hvor ‘their each’ version. We provide the first detailed description of these constructions, in particular their case and word order properties, which raise recalcitrant puzzles, and then we discuss what they say about the syntax of nonfinite verbs. Specifically, the word order and case properties of these constructions indicate that nonfinite verbs in Icelandic undergo short verb movement within the verb phrase. That is, the evidence indicates that the leftmost element in these constructions, alternatively hvor or sinn, originates inside an object DP and moves, by what we call e-raising, to the base position of an antecedent with which it agrees, before being stranded by that very antecedent. Nevertheless, the verb appears to the left of this element, even when it is a nonfinite verb, showing that it must undergo short movement to the left of Spec,vP. In addition, the interaction of e-raising and case has important consequences for Case theory, as it indicates that case agreement and case marking take place in PF.</p>}},
  author       = {{Sigurosson, Halldór Ármann and Wood, Jim and Sigurosson, Einar Freyr}},
  issn         = {{0024-3892}},
  keywords     = {{case; distributives; e-raising; Icelandic; reciprocals; short verb movement; word order; ‘each’}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{07}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{571--588}},
  publisher    = {{MIT Press}},
  series       = {{Linguistic Inquiry}},
  title        = {{Hvor ‘Each’ Reciprocals and Distributives in Icelandic : E-Raising + Short Main Verb Movement}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00411}},
  doi          = {{10.1162/ling_a_00411}},
  volume       = {{53}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}