Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

A Critical Introduction to Instrumental Variables for Sibship Size Based on Twin Births

Öberg, Stefan (2019) In Studies in Economic History p.55-82
Abstract

Research on how children are affected by their sibship size, i.e., their number of siblings, faces a serious hurdle because sibship size is endogenous in the model. The current “gold standard” method to solve this is to use (parity-specific) twin births as instrumental variables. The purpose of this chapter is twofold. Firstly, it introduces instrumental variable methods in general. Secondly, it argues that we need to update our interpretation of instrumental variables for sibship size based on twin births. The essence of my new interpretation is that only some twin births lead to an exogenous increase of the number of children. This seemingly minor update of the interpretation highlights some previously overlooked necessary... (More)

Research on how children are affected by their sibship size, i.e., their number of siblings, faces a serious hurdle because sibship size is endogenous in the model. The current “gold standard” method to solve this is to use (parity-specific) twin births as instrumental variables. The purpose of this chapter is twofold. Firstly, it introduces instrumental variable methods in general. Secondly, it argues that we need to update our interpretation of instrumental variables for sibship size based on twin births. The essence of my new interpretation is that only some twin births lead to an exogenous increase of the number of children. This seemingly minor update of the interpretation highlights some previously overlooked necessary assumptions. Most importantly it shows how the method is intrinsically linked to fertility preferences and how assumptions regarding unintended pregnancies are crucial for identification. We need to assume that families have a fixed desired number of children. We also need to assume either that there are no unintended pregnancies or that parents who have an “unwanted” child through single births are no different from parents who have an “unwanted” child as the result of a twin birth. My introduction therefore contributes to the mounting critique of using twin births as instrumental variables for sibship size. We need to re-evaluate this current “gold standard” method and possibly reinterpret previous results using it.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
alternative title
En kritisk introduktion till instrument-variabler för syskonskarans storlek som är baserade på tvillingfödslar
publishing date
type
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Causal estimation, Exogenous variation, Family size, Natural experiment, Quantity–quality trade-off, Twins
host publication
Cliometrics of the Family
series title
Studies in Economic History
pages
28 pages
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • scopus:85078800395
ISSN
2364-1800
2364-1797
ISBN
978-3-319-99479-6
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-99480-2_4
language
English
LU publication?
no
additional info
Publisher Copyright: © 2019, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
id
3faec86a-4d28-47af-9bde-837f13fe100e
date added to LUP
2025-03-07 10:23:55
date last changed
2025-05-30 17:40:32
@inbook{3faec86a-4d28-47af-9bde-837f13fe100e,
  abstract     = {{<p>Research on how children are affected by their sibship size, i.e., their number of siblings, faces a serious hurdle because sibship size is endogenous in the model. The current “gold standard” method to solve this is to use (parity-specific) twin births as instrumental variables. The purpose of this chapter is twofold. Firstly, it introduces instrumental variable methods in general. Secondly, it argues that we need to update our interpretation of instrumental variables for sibship size based on twin births. The essence of my new interpretation is that only some twin births lead to an exogenous increase of the number of children. This seemingly minor update of the interpretation highlights some previously overlooked necessary assumptions. Most importantly it shows how the method is intrinsically linked to fertility preferences and how assumptions regarding unintended pregnancies are crucial for identification. We need to assume that families have a fixed desired number of children. We also need to assume either that there are no unintended pregnancies or that parents who have an “unwanted” child through single births are no different from parents who have an “unwanted” child as the result of a twin birth. My introduction therefore contributes to the mounting critique of using twin births as instrumental variables for sibship size. We need to re-evaluate this current “gold standard” method and possibly reinterpret previous results using it.</p>}},
  author       = {{Öberg, Stefan}},
  booktitle    = {{Cliometrics of the Family}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-319-99479-6}},
  issn         = {{2364-1800}},
  keywords     = {{Causal estimation; Exogenous variation; Family size; Natural experiment; Quantity–quality trade-off; Twins}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{55--82}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{Studies in Economic History}},
  title        = {{A Critical Introduction to Instrumental Variables for Sibship Size Based on Twin Births}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99480-2_4}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-319-99480-2_4}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}