Automating Tree-Like Resolution in Time n^{o(log n)} Is ETH-Hard
(2021) XI Latin and American Algorithms, Graphs and Optimization Symposium, LAGOS 2021 In Procedia Computer Science 195. p.152-162- Abstract
- We show that tree-like resolution is not automatable in time no(log n) unless ETH is false. This implies that, under ETH, the algorithm given by Beame and Pitassi (FOCS 1996) that automates tree-like resolution in time no(log n) is optimal. We also provide a simpler proof of the result of Alekhnovich and Razborov (FOCS 2001) that unless the fixed parameter hierarchy collapses, tree-like resolution is not automatable in polynomial time. The proof of our results builds on a joint work with Göös, Nordström, Pitassi, Robere and Sokolov (STOC 2021), which presents a simplification of the recent breakthrough of Atserias and Müller (FOCS 2019).
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4015cac1-a1ad-40aa-9e29-055c9f2ddada
- author
- De Rezende, Susanna F.
LU
- publishing date
- 2021
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- host publication
- Proceedings of the XI Latin and American Algorithms, Graphs and Optimization Symposium.
- series title
- Procedia Computer Science
- volume
- 195
- pages
- 152 - 162
- publisher
- Elsevier
- conference name
- XI Latin and American Algorithms, Graphs and Optimization Symposium, LAGOS 2021
- conference location
- Sao Paulo, Brazil
- conference dates
- 2021-05-17 - 2021-05-21
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85122938721
- ISSN
- 1877-0509
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.procs.2021.11.021
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- 4015cac1-a1ad-40aa-9e29-055c9f2ddada
- date added to LUP
- 2022-01-07 23:04:25
- date last changed
- 2025-10-14 11:30:40
@inproceedings{4015cac1-a1ad-40aa-9e29-055c9f2ddada,
abstract = {{We show that tree-like resolution is not automatable in time no(log n) unless ETH is false. This implies that, under ETH, the algorithm given by Beame and Pitassi (FOCS 1996) that automates tree-like resolution in time no(log n) is optimal. We also provide a simpler proof of the result of Alekhnovich and Razborov (FOCS 2001) that unless the fixed parameter hierarchy collapses, tree-like resolution is not automatable in polynomial time. The proof of our results builds on a joint work with Göös, Nordström, Pitassi, Robere and Sokolov (STOC 2021), which presents a simplification of the recent breakthrough of Atserias and Müller (FOCS 2019).}},
author = {{De Rezende, Susanna F.}},
booktitle = {{Proceedings of the XI Latin and American Algorithms, Graphs and Optimization Symposium.}},
issn = {{1877-0509}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{152--162}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Procedia Computer Science}},
title = {{Automating Tree-Like Resolution in Time n^{o(log n)} Is ETH-Hard}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.11.021}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.procs.2021.11.021}},
volume = {{195}},
year = {{2021}},
}