Iøjnefaldende arkitektur. Nordens middelalderlige rundkirker
(2014) In Kuml: Årbog for Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab 2014. p.205-244- Abstract
- Medieval round churches are often seen as riddles in need of special explanation. Deviant architecture has been explained by three major theories – fortification, multi-functionality and symbolic copying. However, I claim that the round churches were normal except for their elite context and extraordinary plan. I then argue, that the elite consciously choose a “conspicuous architecture”, to use a concept inspired by Thorstein Veblen, as a social strategy of status and rivalry. Finally I discuss the theory by Richard Krautheimer on medieval imitation, where selected elements represented a symbolic wholeness, as far as the period was able to produce copies. The medieval building was an active process, where architectural elements from plenty... (More)
- Medieval round churches are often seen as riddles in need of special explanation. Deviant architecture has been explained by three major theories – fortification, multi-functionality and symbolic copying. However, I claim that the round churches were normal except for their elite context and extraordinary plan. I then argue, that the elite consciously choose a “conspicuous architecture”, to use a concept inspired by Thorstein Veblen, as a social strategy of status and rivalry. Finally I discuss the theory by Richard Krautheimer on medieval imitation, where selected elements represented a symbolic wholeness, as far as the period was able to produce copies. The medieval building was an active process, where architectural elements from plenty of sources were reused to create something new, as in the medieval reuse of “spolia”. Every church is unique as a node in a web of relations, where the architecture is related to an infinite number of other buildings. I also shortly present an updated overview of the 34 medieval round churches in Scandinavia as the latest overview for many still is the influential dissertation by Hugo F. Frölen from 1910-11, which wrongly stated, that all round churches were fortified.
Errata p 210: The church of Ny is concecrated to All Saints and the church of Nylars to Saint Nicholas. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4022587
- author
- Wienberg, Jes LU
- organization
- alternative title
- Conspicuous architecture. Medieval round churches in Scandinavia
- publishing date
- 2014
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Round church Conspicuous architecture
- in
- Kuml: Årbog for Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab
- volume
- 2014
- pages
- 205 - 244
- publisher
- Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab
- ISSN
- 0454-6245
- language
- Danish
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 5d46f4fb-f90f-4305-9d36-82e088bb97da (old id 4022587)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 09:12:05
- date last changed
- 2018-11-21 20:51:28
@article{5d46f4fb-f90f-4305-9d36-82e088bb97da, abstract = {{Medieval round churches are often seen as riddles in need of special explanation. Deviant architecture has been explained by three major theories – fortification, multi-functionality and symbolic copying. However, I claim that the round churches were normal except for their elite context and extraordinary plan. I then argue, that the elite consciously choose a “conspicuous architecture”, to use a concept inspired by Thorstein Veblen, as a social strategy of status and rivalry. Finally I discuss the theory by Richard Krautheimer on medieval imitation, where selected elements represented a symbolic wholeness, as far as the period was able to produce copies. The medieval building was an active process, where architectural elements from plenty of sources were reused to create something new, as in the medieval reuse of “spolia”. Every church is unique as a node in a web of relations, where the architecture is related to an infinite number of other buildings. I also shortly present an updated overview of the 34 medieval round churches in Scandinavia as the latest overview for many still is the influential dissertation by Hugo F. Frölen from 1910-11, which wrongly stated, that all round churches were fortified.<br/>Errata p 210: The church of Ny is concecrated to All Saints and the church of Nylars to Saint Nicholas.}}, author = {{Wienberg, Jes}}, issn = {{0454-6245}}, keywords = {{Round church Conspicuous architecture}}, language = {{dan}}, pages = {{205--244}}, publisher = {{Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab}}, series = {{Kuml: Årbog for Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab}}, title = {{Iøjnefaldende arkitektur. Nordens middelalderlige rundkirker}}, url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/5259243/4895586.pdf}}, volume = {{2014}}, year = {{2014}}, }