Advanced

Centennial to millennial geomagnetic field variations

Korte, Monika and Muscheler, Raimund LU (2012) In Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate 2.
Abstract
Reconstructions of the geomagnetic field in the past represent a useful tool not only to investigate the geodynamo process, but also to estimate the effect of geomagnetic shielding for any studies on cosmogenic radionuclides and galactic cosmic rays. A number of new millennial-scale geomagnetic field reconstructions have been published over the last years, based on improved global archeo- and paleomagnetic data compilations. Here we review several spherical harmonic models and compare their dipole field predictions to reconstructions based on virtual axial dipole moments and virtual geomagnetic poles. Dipole intensity estimates from cosmogenic radionuclide production records, with suitable filtering to minimise the solar influence, have... (More)
Reconstructions of the geomagnetic field in the past represent a useful tool not only to investigate the geodynamo process, but also to estimate the effect of geomagnetic shielding for any studies on cosmogenic radionuclides and galactic cosmic rays. A number of new millennial-scale geomagnetic field reconstructions have been published over the last years, based on improved global archeo- and paleomagnetic data compilations. Here we review several spherical harmonic models and compare their dipole field predictions to reconstructions based on virtual axial dipole moments and virtual geomagnetic poles. Dipole intensity estimates from cosmogenic radionuclide production records, with suitable filtering to minimise the solar influence, have also been included in the comparison to provide independent information about variations in the strength of the geomagnetic field. However, due to differences among geomagnetic models and between C-14 and Be-10 production records this comparison is fairly inconclusive with respect to multi-centennial variations. Different geomagnetic dipole tilt reconstructions agree well for much of the Holocene, but dipole moment estimates still differ substantially. Recent spherical harmonic models for the past 3 and 10 kyrs have improved considerably compared to earlier versions. Nevertheless at present we recommend to test if any interpretation depends on the choice of model. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
magnetic field, geomagnetic dipole intensity, geomagnetic shielding, cosmogenic radionuclide production
in
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
volume
2
publisher
EDP Sciences
external identifiers
  • wos:000325007800008
  • scopus:84882278504
ISSN
2115-7251
DOI
10.1051/swsc/2012006
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
934987e5-189b-43aa-8d64-7946fe949740 (old id 4172486)
date added to LUP
2013-11-21 12:39:48
date last changed
2017-01-01 06:14:14
@article{934987e5-189b-43aa-8d64-7946fe949740,
  abstract     = {Reconstructions of the geomagnetic field in the past represent a useful tool not only to investigate the geodynamo process, but also to estimate the effect of geomagnetic shielding for any studies on cosmogenic radionuclides and galactic cosmic rays. A number of new millennial-scale geomagnetic field reconstructions have been published over the last years, based on improved global archeo- and paleomagnetic data compilations. Here we review several spherical harmonic models and compare their dipole field predictions to reconstructions based on virtual axial dipole moments and virtual geomagnetic poles. Dipole intensity estimates from cosmogenic radionuclide production records, with suitable filtering to minimise the solar influence, have also been included in the comparison to provide independent information about variations in the strength of the geomagnetic field. However, due to differences among geomagnetic models and between C-14 and Be-10 production records this comparison is fairly inconclusive with respect to multi-centennial variations. Different geomagnetic dipole tilt reconstructions agree well for much of the Holocene, but dipole moment estimates still differ substantially. Recent spherical harmonic models for the past 3 and 10 kyrs have improved considerably compared to earlier versions. Nevertheless at present we recommend to test if any interpretation depends on the choice of model.},
  author       = {Korte, Monika and Muscheler, Raimund},
  issn         = {2115-7251},
  keyword      = {magnetic field,geomagnetic dipole intensity,geomagnetic shielding,cosmogenic radionuclide production},
  language     = {eng},
  publisher    = {EDP Sciences},
  series       = {Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate},
  title        = {Centennial to millennial geomagnetic field variations},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2012006},
  volume       = {2},
  year         = {2012},
}