Blurred Science : The Incessant Pending Between Truth and Mistakes
(2014) In Lund University Research Magazine- Abstract
- Both in the humanities and in the sciences, researchers make mistakes, and this is an essential part of the creative process. In a wider historical perspective, dead-ends can turn out to be the way forward.
Two fathers of scientific systems, Aristotle and Carl Linnaeus, serve as an argument for the thesis that errors, or what we later label as such, are a necessary element of scientific work. In their day, the errors were meaningful interpretations that formed part of a coherent, comprehensible worldview.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4276252
- author
- Höög, Victoria LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2014
- type
- Contribution to specialist publication or newspaper
- publication status
- in press
- subject
- in
- Lund University Research Magazine
- publisher
- Lund University
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 5f346d98-25bb-4e33-a7d1-49d51dc40c0c (old id 4276252)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 10:16:53
- date last changed
- 2019-11-25 11:31:42
@misc{5f346d98-25bb-4e33-a7d1-49d51dc40c0c, abstract = {{Both in the humanities and in the sciences, researchers make mistakes, and this is an essential part of the creative process. In a wider historical perspective, dead-ends can turn out to be the way forward. <br/><br> Two fathers of scientific systems, Aristotle and Carl Linnaeus, serve as an argument for the thesis that errors, or what we later label as such, are a necessary element of scientific work. In their day, the errors were meaningful interpretations that formed part of a coherent, comprehensible worldview.}}, author = {{Höög, Victoria}}, language = {{eng}}, publisher = {{Lund University}}, series = {{Lund University Research Magazine}}, title = {{Blurred Science : The Incessant Pending Between Truth and Mistakes}}, year = {{2014}}, }