We looked at 1,154 climate science results and found no evidence of ‘publication bias’
(2017) In The Conversation- Abstract
- It is rare to encounter a scientific fact that stirs widespread debate and distrust quite like the matter of climate change.
Despite consensus among climate specialists about a theory that is supported by a mountain of facts from the physical, natural, and cultural sciences, the debate continues to be perpetrated by politicians, industrialists, academics, and armchair scientists.
When governments reject science, the rest of us are put at risk. By refusing to accept the facts and potential ramifications of climate change, as a society, we stand to delay or overlook actions that are urgently needed to reduce our impact on the environment and adapt our cities and farmlands to a different future.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/435ffc6c-d5aa-49e8-affd-da1b4d30a8bb
- author
- Hollander, Johan LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2017-10-05
- type
- Contribution to specialist publication or newspaper
- publication status
- published
- subject
- categories
- Popular Science
- in
- The Conversation
- publisher
- The Conversation
- ISSN
- 2201-5639
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 435ffc6c-d5aa-49e8-affd-da1b4d30a8bb
- alternative location
- https://theconversation.com/we-looked-at-1-154-climate-science-results-and-found-no-evidence-of-publication-bias-84500
- date added to LUP
- 2023-04-21 14:38:33
- date last changed
- 2023-05-26 13:30:54
@misc{435ffc6c-d5aa-49e8-affd-da1b4d30a8bb,
abstract = {{It is rare to encounter a scientific fact that stirs widespread debate and distrust quite like the matter of climate change.<br/><br/>Despite consensus among climate specialists about a theory that is supported by a mountain of facts from the physical, natural, and cultural sciences, the debate continues to be perpetrated by politicians, industrialists, academics, and armchair scientists.<br/><br/>When governments reject science, the rest of us are put at risk. By refusing to accept the facts and potential ramifications of climate change, as a society, we stand to delay or overlook actions that are urgently needed to reduce our impact on the environment and adapt our cities and farmlands to a different future.}},
author = {{Hollander, Johan}},
issn = {{2201-5639}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{10}},
publisher = {{The Conversation}},
series = {{The Conversation}},
title = {{We looked at 1,154 climate science results and found no evidence of ‘publication bias’}},
url = {{https://theconversation.com/we-looked-at-1-154-climate-science-results-and-found-no-evidence-of-publication-bias-84500}},
year = {{2017}},
}