Freedom Fit for a Feminist? On the Feminist Potential of Quentin Skinner's Conception of Republican Freedom
(2014) In Redescriptions: Yearbook of Political Thought and Conceptual History 17(1). p.86-103- Abstract
- The aim of this paper is to make it credible that there are feminist reasons for being a republican about freedom. In focus is Quentin Skinner’s conception of republican, or “neo-Roman”, freedom. Republican theory in history has not excelled in making poverty, gender hierarchy, and racism within the republic into main sources of concern. So can there be a radical republican theory of liberty fit for a feminist, to make sense of arbitrary power in the every day life of work, households, and local communities, where power is vague and unorganized? Proceeding from three questions – What does freedom mean? Under what circumstances does the issue arise? Why should we care? – I argue that in a feminist republicanism the lived experience of the... (More)
- The aim of this paper is to make it credible that there are feminist reasons for being a republican about freedom. In focus is Quentin Skinner’s conception of republican, or “neo-Roman”, freedom. Republican theory in history has not excelled in making poverty, gender hierarchy, and racism within the republic into main sources of concern. So can there be a radical republican theory of liberty fit for a feminist, to make sense of arbitrary power in the every day life of work, households, and local communities, where power is vague and unorganized? Proceeding from three questions – What does freedom mean? Under what circumstances does the issue arise? Why should we care? – I argue that in a feminist republicanism the lived experience of the unfree will have primary and not, as Skinner now suggests, secondary importance. A feminist republican will be particularly concerned not only with what unfreedom is but with what it is like. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4391548
- author
- Halldenius, Lena LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2014
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- feminism, republicanism, freedom, institutional circumstance, lived experience, arbitrary power, citizen, Quentin Skinner
- in
- Redescriptions: Yearbook of Political Thought and Conceptual History
- volume
- 17
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 86 - 103
- publisher
- Helsinki University Press
- DOI
- 10.7227/R.17.1.5
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 3559c6f7-8f6a-4c8d-b80f-223ae34e29e5 (old id 4391548)
- alternative location
- http://manchester.metapress.com/content/122826/
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 11:09:19
- date last changed
- 2022-03-14 16:41:25
@article{3559c6f7-8f6a-4c8d-b80f-223ae34e29e5, abstract = {{The aim of this paper is to make it credible that there are feminist reasons for being a republican about freedom. In focus is Quentin Skinner’s conception of republican, or “neo-Roman”, freedom. Republican theory in history has not excelled in making poverty, gender hierarchy, and racism within the republic into main sources of concern. So can there be a radical republican theory of liberty fit for a feminist, to make sense of arbitrary power in the every day life of work, households, and local communities, where power is vague and unorganized? Proceeding from three questions – What does freedom mean? Under what circumstances does the issue arise? Why should we care? – I argue that in a feminist republicanism the lived experience of the unfree will have primary and not, as Skinner now suggests, secondary importance. A feminist republican will be particularly concerned not only with what unfreedom is but with what it is like.}}, author = {{Halldenius, Lena}}, keywords = {{feminism; republicanism; freedom; institutional circumstance; lived experience; arbitrary power; citizen; Quentin Skinner}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{86--103}}, publisher = {{Helsinki University Press}}, series = {{Redescriptions: Yearbook of Political Thought and Conceptual History}}, title = {{Freedom Fit for a Feminist? On the Feminist Potential of Quentin Skinner's Conception of Republican Freedom}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/R.17.1.5}}, doi = {{10.7227/R.17.1.5}}, volume = {{17}}, year = {{2014}}, }