Exploring degrowth policy proposals: A systematic mapping with thematic synthesis
(2022) In Journal of Cleaner Production 365.- Abstract
- Degrowth – the planned and democratic reduction of production and consumption as a solution to the social-ecological crises – is slowly making its way to the sphere of policy-making. But there is a problem: proposals are scattered through a voluminous literature, making it difficult for decision-makers to pinpoint the concrete changes associated with the idea of degrowth. To address this issue, we conducted a systematic mapping of the degrowth literature from 2005 to 2020 using the RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES) methodology. Out of a total of 1166 texts (articles, books, book chapters, and student theses) referring to degrowth, we identified 446 that include specific policy proposals. This systematic counting... (More)
- Degrowth – the planned and democratic reduction of production and consumption as a solution to the social-ecological crises – is slowly making its way to the sphere of policy-making. But there is a problem: proposals are scattered through a voluminous literature, making it difficult for decision-makers to pinpoint the concrete changes associated with the idea of degrowth. To address this issue, we conducted a systematic mapping of the degrowth literature from 2005 to 2020 using the RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES) methodology. Out of a total of 1166 texts (articles, books, book chapters, and student theses) referring to degrowth, we identified 446 that include specific policy proposals. This systematic counting of policies led to a grand total of 530 proposals (50 goals, 100 objectives, 380 instruments), which makes it the most exhaustive degrowth policy agenda ever presented. To render this toolbox more accessible, we divided it into in 13 policy themes – food, culture and education, energy and environment, governance and geopolitics, indicators, inequality, finance, production and consumption, science and technology, tourism, trade, urban planning, and work – systematically making the difference between goals, objectives, and instruments. Following this, we assess the precision, frequency, quality, and diversity of this agenda, reflecting on how the degrowth policy toolbox has been evolving until today. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/43d9e864-7f55-45e4-a098-06b1b073cc50
- author
- Fitzpatrick, Nick ; Parrique, Timothée LU and Cosme, Inês
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- volume
- 365
- article number
- 132764
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85132506815
- ISSN
- 0959-6526
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132764
- project
- Postgrowth Welfare Systems
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 43d9e864-7f55-45e4-a098-06b1b073cc50
- date added to LUP
- 2022-07-05 17:53:38
- date last changed
- 2022-10-17 13:27:20
@article{43d9e864-7f55-45e4-a098-06b1b073cc50,
abstract = {{Degrowth – the planned and democratic reduction of production and consumption as a solution to the social-ecological crises – is slowly making its way to the sphere of policy-making. But there is a problem: proposals are scattered through a voluminous literature, making it difficult for decision-makers to pinpoint the concrete changes associated with the idea of degrowth. To address this issue, we conducted a systematic mapping of the degrowth literature from 2005 to 2020 using the RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES) methodology. Out of a total of 1166 texts (articles, books, book chapters, and student theses) referring to degrowth, we identified 446 that include specific policy proposals. This systematic counting of policies led to a grand total of 530 proposals (50 goals, 100 objectives, 380 instruments), which makes it the most exhaustive degrowth policy agenda ever presented. To render this toolbox more accessible, we divided it into in 13 policy themes – food, culture and education, energy and environment, governance and geopolitics, indicators, inequality, finance, production and consumption, science and technology, tourism, trade, urban planning, and work – systematically making the difference between goals, objectives, and instruments. Following this, we assess the precision, frequency, quality, and diversity of this agenda, reflecting on how the degrowth policy toolbox has been evolving until today.}},
author = {{Fitzpatrick, Nick and Parrique, Timothée and Cosme, Inês}},
issn = {{0959-6526}},
language = {{eng}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Journal of Cleaner Production}},
title = {{Exploring degrowth policy proposals: A systematic mapping with thematic synthesis}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132764}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132764}},
volume = {{365}},
year = {{2022}},
}