Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Evaluating preservation medium for the storage of DNA in African lion Panthera leo faecal samples

Tende, Talatu LU ; Hansson, Bengt LU orcid ; Ottosson, Ulf LU and Bensch, Staffan LU (2014) In Current Zoology 60(3). p.351-358
Abstract
Lion faecal samples, collected in the field between 1 hour to 1 week after defecation were preserved in three different media (ethanol, ASL buffer and Two-step storage). The aim was to determine which faecal DNA field preservation method best enhances PCR amplification success. Samples stored in ethanol showed a significantly higher amplification success of microsatellite loci than samples stored in the other two media. In contrast, amplification success of a mitochondrial locus was similar among the samples stored in the three types of media. We reviewed twelve previous studies that employed different media for the storage of faeces, although patterns of success were not fully consistent among different media, ethanol storage was scored... (More)
Lion faecal samples, collected in the field between 1 hour to 1 week after defecation were preserved in three different media (ethanol, ASL buffer and Two-step storage). The aim was to determine which faecal DNA field preservation method best enhances PCR amplification success. Samples stored in ethanol showed a significantly higher amplification success of microsatellite loci than samples stored in the other two media. In contrast, amplification success of a mitochondrial locus was similar among the samples stored in the three types of media. We reviewed twelve previous studies that employed different media for the storage of faeces, although patterns of success were not fully consistent among different media, ethanol storage was scored highest in the majority of these tests. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Amplification success, Faecal sample DNA, Lion Panthera leo, PCR, Preservation medium
in
Current Zoology
volume
60
issue
3
pages
351 - 358
publisher
Oxford University Press
external identifiers
  • wos:000338119400004
  • scopus:84903135826
ISSN
1674-5507
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
ed84f69f-77b1-4c89-ae18-7461d3f1246c (old id 4608688)
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 13:24:01
date last changed
2021-09-22 01:06:28
@article{ed84f69f-77b1-4c89-ae18-7461d3f1246c,
  abstract     = {Lion faecal samples, collected in the field between 1 hour to 1 week after defecation were preserved in three different media (ethanol, ASL buffer and Two-step storage). The aim was to determine which faecal DNA field preservation method best enhances PCR amplification success. Samples stored in ethanol showed a significantly higher amplification success of microsatellite loci than samples stored in the other two media. In contrast, amplification success of a mitochondrial locus was similar among the samples stored in the three types of media. We reviewed twelve previous studies that employed different media for the storage of faeces, although patterns of success were not fully consistent among different media, ethanol storage was scored highest in the majority of these tests.},
  author       = {Tende, Talatu and Hansson, Bengt and Ottosson, Ulf and Bensch, Staffan},
  issn         = {1674-5507},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {351--358},
  publisher    = {Oxford University Press},
  series       = {Current Zoology},
  title        = {Evaluating preservation medium for the storage of DNA in African lion Panthera leo faecal samples},
  volume       = {60},
  year         = {2014},
}