Methodologic support in habilitation and rehabilitation: communicative action between practice and science
(2000) In Journal of Allied Health 29(4). p.227-234- Abstract
- This study evaluated the early phase of development of a model for quality improvement of habilitation and rehabilitation project processes. The focus of the methodologic support in habilitation and rehabilitation model was on cooperation between practice contexts and science. Habermas' theory about communicative action was a theoretical frame of reference. Three project coordinators and ten project leaders were interviewed. The results revealed different attitudes towards methodologic support activities, demonstrating the importance of acknowledging cognitive and social functions, the process of legitimization, different approaches of practice versus science, and problems regarding information and communication. The model was shown to be... (More)
- This study evaluated the early phase of development of a model for quality improvement of habilitation and rehabilitation project processes. The focus of the methodologic support in habilitation and rehabilitation model was on cooperation between practice contexts and science. Habermas' theory about communicative action was a theoretical frame of reference. Three project coordinators and ten project leaders were interviewed. The results revealed different attitudes towards methodologic support activities, demonstrating the importance of acknowledging cognitive and social functions, the process of legitimization, different approaches of practice versus science, and problems regarding information and communication. The model was shown to be important in bridging the gap between practice and science. To support reflective and emancipatory cognitive learning, more efforts to foster communicative action are called for, and more attention must be paid to the importance different missions and organizational structures have for the development of the dialog between practitioners and researchers. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1117243
- author
- Iwarsson, Susanne LU ; Jernryd, Elisabeth LU ; Rutström, C and Boqvist, A
- organization
- publishing date
- 2000
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Journal of Allied Health
- volume
- 29
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 227 - 234
- publisher
- Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:11147189
- scopus:0034565833
- ISSN
- 0090-7421
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015. The record was previously connected to the following departments: Division of Occupational Therapy (Closed 2012) (013025000)
- id
- 47dc843c-2df8-4e73-a7ea-37bb3b865952 (old id 1117243)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 16:45:44
- date last changed
- 2022-01-28 21:55:57
@article{47dc843c-2df8-4e73-a7ea-37bb3b865952,
abstract = {{This study evaluated the early phase of development of a model for quality improvement of habilitation and rehabilitation project processes. The focus of the methodologic support in habilitation and rehabilitation model was on cooperation between practice contexts and science. Habermas' theory about communicative action was a theoretical frame of reference. Three project coordinators and ten project leaders were interviewed. The results revealed different attitudes towards methodologic support activities, demonstrating the importance of acknowledging cognitive and social functions, the process of legitimization, different approaches of practice versus science, and problems regarding information and communication. The model was shown to be important in bridging the gap between practice and science. To support reflective and emancipatory cognitive learning, more efforts to foster communicative action are called for, and more attention must be paid to the importance different missions and organizational structures have for the development of the dialog between practitioners and researchers.}},
author = {{Iwarsson, Susanne and Jernryd, Elisabeth and Rutström, C and Boqvist, A}},
issn = {{0090-7421}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{4}},
pages = {{227--234}},
publisher = {{Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions}},
series = {{Journal of Allied Health}},
title = {{Methodologic support in habilitation and rehabilitation: communicative action between practice and science}},
volume = {{29}},
year = {{2000}},
}