Comparing charcoal and zeolite reflection filters for volatile anaesthetics: A laboratory evaluation.
(2015) In European Journal of Anaesthesiology 32(8). p.521-526- Abstract
- A modified heat-moisture exchanger that incorporates a reflecting filter for use with partial rebreathing of exhaled volatile anaesthetics has been commercially available since the 1990s. The main advantages of the device are efficient delivery of inhaled sedation to intensive care patients and reduced anaesthetic consumption during anaesthesia. However, elevated arterial CO2 values have been observed with an anaesthetic conserving device compared with a conventional heat and moisture exchanger, despite compensation for larger apparatus dead space.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4816968
- author
- Walther Sturesson, Louise LU ; Frennström, Jan O ; Ilardi, Marcella and Reinstrup, Peter LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2015
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- European Journal of Anaesthesiology
- volume
- 32
- issue
- 8
- pages
- 521 - 526
- publisher
- European Society of Anaesthesiology
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:25387299
- wos:000358288400002
- scopus:84937953188
- pmid:25387299
- ISSN
- 1365-2346
- DOI
- 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000177
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 36ad24e6-ebe5-48fb-a707-3c13bd722529 (old id 4816968)
- alternative location
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25387299?dopt=Abstract
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 11:03:21
- date last changed
- 2022-04-12 20:04:50
@article{36ad24e6-ebe5-48fb-a707-3c13bd722529,
abstract = {{A modified heat-moisture exchanger that incorporates a reflecting filter for use with partial rebreathing of exhaled volatile anaesthetics has been commercially available since the 1990s. The main advantages of the device are efficient delivery of inhaled sedation to intensive care patients and reduced anaesthetic consumption during anaesthesia. However, elevated arterial CO2 values have been observed with an anaesthetic conserving device compared with a conventional heat and moisture exchanger, despite compensation for larger apparatus dead space.}},
author = {{Walther Sturesson, Louise and Frennström, Jan O and Ilardi, Marcella and Reinstrup, Peter}},
issn = {{1365-2346}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{8}},
pages = {{521--526}},
publisher = {{European Society of Anaesthesiology}},
series = {{European Journal of Anaesthesiology}},
title = {{Comparing charcoal and zeolite reflection filters for volatile anaesthetics: A laboratory evaluation.}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000177}},
doi = {{10.1097/EJA.0000000000000177}},
volume = {{32}},
year = {{2015}},
}