Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Antibiotic Prescribing in Dental Medicine—Best Practices for Successful Implementation

Săndulescu, Oana ; Preoțescu, Liliana Lucia ; Streinu-Cercel, Adrian ; Şahin, Gülşen Özkaya LU and Săndulescu, Mihai (2024) In Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 9(2).
Abstract

With rising rates of antimicrobial resistance throughout the world, it is time to revisit antibiotic prescribing policies and practices, and dentistry is an important area for focused intervention, as it accounts for up to 15% of all antimicrobial prescriptions. In this narrative review, we have analyzed the current state of the knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding antimicrobial use among dental professionals, and we have identified a set of seven recurring themes that drive inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in dental medicine. These include: 1. Prescribing antibiotics to delay or avoid dental treatment. 2. Overlooking the 5Ds—dental treatment (source control), dental condition (indication), drug (antibiotic choice), dose,... (More)

With rising rates of antimicrobial resistance throughout the world, it is time to revisit antibiotic prescribing policies and practices, and dentistry is an important area for focused intervention, as it accounts for up to 15% of all antimicrobial prescriptions. In this narrative review, we have analyzed the current state of the knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding antimicrobial use among dental professionals, and we have identified a set of seven recurring themes that drive inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in dental medicine. These include: 1. Prescribing antibiotics to delay or avoid dental treatment. 2. Overlooking the 5Ds—dental treatment (source control), dental condition (indication), drug (antibiotic choice), dose, and duration. 3. Relying on education from the distant past and on previous experience. 4. The heterogeneity of (too many) guideline recommendations leads to confusion and over-prescribing. 5. Decreased access to guideline information in private practice. 6. Psychological factors such as pressure to prescribe, comfort prescribing and the weekend effect, and 7. Feeling removed from antimicrobial resistance and externalizing responsibility. Based on the existing knowledge, we propose a framework based on four key pillars for focused intervention: 1. Education. 2. Internalizing responsibility. 3. Recognizing recurring counter-productive practices, and 4. Addressing recurring counter-productive practices. This framework can be applied in different dental settings to ensure best practices for the successful implementation of rational antimicrobial prescribing.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
antibiotic resistance, antibiotics, antimicrobial use, dentistry, rational use
in
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
volume
9
issue
2
article number
31
publisher
MDPI AG
external identifiers
  • pmid:38393120
  • scopus:85185910897
ISSN
2414-6366
DOI
10.3390/tropicalmed9020031
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
4851be24-a29a-470c-9dc2-2325a25ed8dc
date added to LUP
2024-03-25 12:38:49
date last changed
2024-04-22 14:53:30
@article{4851be24-a29a-470c-9dc2-2325a25ed8dc,
  abstract     = {{<p>With rising rates of antimicrobial resistance throughout the world, it is time to revisit antibiotic prescribing policies and practices, and dentistry is an important area for focused intervention, as it accounts for up to 15% of all antimicrobial prescriptions. In this narrative review, we have analyzed the current state of the knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding antimicrobial use among dental professionals, and we have identified a set of seven recurring themes that drive inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in dental medicine. These include: 1. Prescribing antibiotics to delay or avoid dental treatment. 2. Overlooking the 5Ds—dental treatment (source control), dental condition (indication), drug (antibiotic choice), dose, and duration. 3. Relying on education from the distant past and on previous experience. 4. The heterogeneity of (too many) guideline recommendations leads to confusion and over-prescribing. 5. Decreased access to guideline information in private practice. 6. Psychological factors such as pressure to prescribe, comfort prescribing and the weekend effect, and 7. Feeling removed from antimicrobial resistance and externalizing responsibility. Based on the existing knowledge, we propose a framework based on four key pillars for focused intervention: 1. Education. 2. Internalizing responsibility. 3. Recognizing recurring counter-productive practices, and 4. Addressing recurring counter-productive practices. This framework can be applied in different dental settings to ensure best practices for the successful implementation of rational antimicrobial prescribing.</p>}},
  author       = {{Săndulescu, Oana and Preoțescu, Liliana Lucia and Streinu-Cercel, Adrian and Şahin, Gülşen Özkaya and Săndulescu, Mihai}},
  issn         = {{2414-6366}},
  keywords     = {{antibiotic resistance; antibiotics; antimicrobial use; dentistry; rational use}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{2}},
  publisher    = {{MDPI AG}},
  series       = {{Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease}},
  title        = {{Antibiotic Prescribing in Dental Medicine—Best Practices for Successful Implementation}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9020031}},
  doi          = {{10.3390/tropicalmed9020031}},
  volume       = {{9}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}