Advanced

International comparative evaluation of knee replacement with fixed or mobile non-posterior-stabilized implants.

Namba, Robert; Graves, Stephen; Robertsson, Otto LU ; Furnes, Ove; Stea, Susanna; Puig-Verdié, Lluis; Hoeffel, Daniel; Cafri, Guy; Paxton, Elizabeth and Sedrakyan, Art (2014) In Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 96A. p.52-58
Abstract
Mobile-bearing total knee prostheses were designed to reduce wear and improve implant survivorship following total knee arthroplasty. However, the benefit of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty remains unproven. Both mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty implants are available in posterior-stabilized and non-posterior-stabilized designs. With the latter, the implant does not recreate the function of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) with a posterior-stabilizing cam mechanism. The purpose of the present study was to compare mobile-bearing, non-posterior-stabilized devices with fixed-bearing, non-posterior-stabilized devices used in total knee arthroplasty through a novel multinational study design.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume
volume
96A
pages
52 - 58
publisher
Journal Bone Joint Surgery Inc
external identifiers
  • pmid:25520419
  • wos:000347477000008
  • scopus:84924230027
ISSN
1535-1386
DOI
10.2106/JBJS.N.00466
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
c3d89c4c-a899-4775-8c16-eb02274a6add (old id 4907979)
alternative location
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25520419?dopt=Abstract
date added to LUP
2015-01-07 15:18:58
date last changed
2017-09-10 03:17:52
@article{c3d89c4c-a899-4775-8c16-eb02274a6add,
  abstract     = {Mobile-bearing total knee prostheses were designed to reduce wear and improve implant survivorship following total knee arthroplasty. However, the benefit of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty remains unproven. Both mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty implants are available in posterior-stabilized and non-posterior-stabilized designs. With the latter, the implant does not recreate the function of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) with a posterior-stabilizing cam mechanism. The purpose of the present study was to compare mobile-bearing, non-posterior-stabilized devices with fixed-bearing, non-posterior-stabilized devices used in total knee arthroplasty through a novel multinational study design.},
  author       = {Namba, Robert and Graves, Stephen and Robertsson, Otto and Furnes, Ove and Stea, Susanna and Puig-Verdié, Lluis and Hoeffel, Daniel and Cafri, Guy and Paxton, Elizabeth and Sedrakyan, Art},
  issn         = {1535-1386},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {52--58},
  publisher    = {Journal Bone Joint Surgery Inc},
  series       = {Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume},
  title        = {International comparative evaluation of knee replacement with fixed or mobile non-posterior-stabilized implants.},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00466},
  volume       = {96A},
  year         = {2014},
}