International comparative evaluation of knee replacement with fixed or mobile non-posterior-stabilized implants.
(2014) In Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 96A. p.52-58- Abstract
- Mobile-bearing total knee prostheses were designed to reduce wear and improve implant survivorship following total knee arthroplasty. However, the benefit of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty remains unproven. Both mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty implants are available in posterior-stabilized and non-posterior-stabilized designs. With the latter, the implant does not recreate the function of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) with a posterior-stabilizing cam mechanism. The purpose of the present study was to compare mobile-bearing, non-posterior-stabilized devices with fixed-bearing, non-posterior-stabilized devices used in total knee arthroplasty through a novel multinational study design.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4907979
- author
- Namba, Robert ; Graves, Stephen ; Robertsson, Otto LU ; Furnes, Ove ; Stea, Susanna ; Puig-Verdié, Lluis ; Hoeffel, Daniel ; Cafri, Guy ; Paxton, Elizabeth and Sedrakyan, Art
- organization
- publishing date
- 2014
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume
- volume
- 96A
- pages
- 52 - 58
- publisher
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:25520419
- wos:000347477000008
- scopus:84924230027
- pmid:25520419
- ISSN
- 1535-1386
- DOI
- 10.2106/JBJS.N.00466
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- c3d89c4c-a899-4775-8c16-eb02274a6add (old id 4907979)
- alternative location
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25520419?dopt=Abstract
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 10:37:59
- date last changed
- 2022-02-10 03:57:59
@article{c3d89c4c-a899-4775-8c16-eb02274a6add, abstract = {{Mobile-bearing total knee prostheses were designed to reduce wear and improve implant survivorship following total knee arthroplasty. However, the benefit of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty remains unproven. Both mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty implants are available in posterior-stabilized and non-posterior-stabilized designs. With the latter, the implant does not recreate the function of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) with a posterior-stabilizing cam mechanism. The purpose of the present study was to compare mobile-bearing, non-posterior-stabilized devices with fixed-bearing, non-posterior-stabilized devices used in total knee arthroplasty through a novel multinational study design.}}, author = {{Namba, Robert and Graves, Stephen and Robertsson, Otto and Furnes, Ove and Stea, Susanna and Puig-Verdié, Lluis and Hoeffel, Daniel and Cafri, Guy and Paxton, Elizabeth and Sedrakyan, Art}}, issn = {{1535-1386}}, language = {{eng}}, pages = {{52--58}}, publisher = {{Lippincott Williams & Wilkins}}, series = {{Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume}}, title = {{International comparative evaluation of knee replacement with fixed or mobile non-posterior-stabilized implants.}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00466}}, doi = {{10.2106/JBJS.N.00466}}, volume = {{96A}}, year = {{2014}}, }