Advanced

Pay for performance associated with increased volume of medication reviews but not with less inappropriate use of medications among the elderly – an observational study

Ödesjö, H.; Boman, A.; Anell, Anders LU ; Fastbom, J.; Thorn, J. and Björck, S. (2017) In Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 35(3). p.271-278
Abstract
Objective: A pay for performance programme was introduced in 2009 by a Swedish county with 1.6 million inhabitants. A process measure with payment linked to coding for medication reviews among the elderly was adopted. We assessed the association with inappropriate medication for five years after baseline.

Design and setting: Observational study that compared medication for elderly patients enrolled at primary care units that coded for a high or low volume of medication reviews.

Patients: 144,222 individuals at 196 primary care centres, age 75 or older.

Main outcome measures:
Percentage of patients receiving inappropriate drugs or polypharmacy during five years at primary care units... (More)
Objective: A pay for performance programme was introduced in 2009 by a Swedish county with 1.6 million inhabitants. A process measure with payment linked to coding for medication reviews among the elderly was adopted. We assessed the association with inappropriate medication for five years after baseline.

Design and setting: Observational study that compared medication for elderly patients enrolled at primary care units that coded for a high or low volume of medication reviews.

Patients: 144,222 individuals at 196 primary care centres, age 75 or older.

Main outcome measures:
Percentage of patients receiving inappropriate drugs or polypharmacy during five years at primary care units with various levels of reported medication reviews.

Results: The proportion of patients with a registered medication review had increased from 3.2% to 44.1% after five years. The high-coding units performed better for most indicators but had already done so at baseline. Primary care units with the lowest payment for coding for medication reviews improved just as well in terms of inappropriate drugs as units with the highest payment – from 13.0 to 8.5%, compared to 11.6 to 7.4% and from 13.6 to 7.2% vs 11.8 to 6.5% for polypharmacy.

Conclusions: Payment linked to coding for medication reviews was associated with an increase in the percentage of patients for whom a medication review had been registered. However, the impact of payment on quality improvement is uncertain, given that units with the lowest payment for medication reviews improved equally well as units with the highest payment. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
primary health care, Sweden, pay for performance, health care quality assessment, quality indicators, elderly, potentially inappropriate medication list
in
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
volume
35
issue
3
pages
8 pages
publisher
Taylor & Francis
external identifiers
  • scopus:85028549914
  • wos:000409262100007
ISSN
0281-3432
DOI
10.1080/02813432.2017.1358434
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
4993826f-c8e2-4e5e-86d9-300f46f7e536
date added to LUP
2017-09-17 15:51:36
date last changed
2018-01-16 13:25:54
@article{4993826f-c8e2-4e5e-86d9-300f46f7e536,
  abstract     = {<b>Objective:</b> A pay for performance programme was introduced in 2009 by a Swedish county with 1.6 million inhabitants. A process measure with payment linked to coding for medication reviews among the elderly was adopted. We assessed the association with inappropriate medication for five years after baseline.<br/><br/><b>Design and setting:</b> Observational study that compared medication for elderly patients enrolled at primary care units that coded for a high or low volume of medication reviews.<br/><br/><b>Patients:</b> 144,222 individuals at 196 primary care centres, age 75 or older.<br/><b><br/>Main outcome measures:</b> Percentage of patients receiving inappropriate drugs or polypharmacy during five years at primary care units with various levels of reported medication reviews.<br/><br/><b>Results:</b> The proportion of patients with a registered medication review had increased from 3.2% to 44.1% after five years. The high-coding units performed better for most indicators but had already done so at baseline. Primary care units with the lowest payment for coding for medication reviews improved just as well in terms of inappropriate drugs as units with the highest payment – from 13.0 to 8.5%, compared to 11.6 to 7.4% and from 13.6 to 7.2% vs 11.8 to 6.5% for polypharmacy.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions:</b> Payment linked to coding for medication reviews was associated with an increase in the percentage of patients for whom a medication review had been registered. However, the impact of payment on quality improvement is uncertain, given that units with the lowest payment for medication reviews improved equally well as units with the highest payment.},
  author       = {Ödesjö, H. and Boman, A. and Anell, Anders and Fastbom, J. and Thorn, J. and Björck, S.},
  issn         = {0281-3432},
  keyword      = {primary health care,Sweden,pay for performance,health care quality assessment,quality indicators,elderly,potentially inappropriate medication list},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {271--278},
  publisher    = {Taylor & Francis},
  series       = {Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care},
  title        = {Pay for performance associated with increased volume of medication reviews but not with less inappropriate use of medications among the elderly – an observational study},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2017.1358434},
  volume       = {35},
  year         = {2017},
}