Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Effectiveness of elevated intraocular pressure as a criterion for glaucoma referral after 6 years of follow-up

Nilsson, Andreas G. and Peters, Dorothea LU (2021) In Clinical Ophthalmology 15. p.3041-3049
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term predictive value of the need to treat patients referred by optometric practitioners, regarding glaucoma, in Malmö, Sweden, using intraocular pressure (IOP) as the primary referral criterion. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 94 of 108 (87%) individuals referred to the Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, Sweden, for elevated IOP during 2012– 2013. Data were extracted from patient records by the end of 2019. Positive outcome was defined as glaucoma, treated suspected glaucoma or treated ocular hypertension (OH) at referral or during the follow-up period. Positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated using different hypothetical thresholds for age and IOP-levels. Long-term... (More)

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term predictive value of the need to treat patients referred by optometric practitioners, regarding glaucoma, in Malmö, Sweden, using intraocular pressure (IOP) as the primary referral criterion. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 94 of 108 (87%) individuals referred to the Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, Sweden, for elevated IOP during 2012– 2013. Data were extracted from patient records by the end of 2019. Positive outcome was defined as glaucoma, treated suspected glaucoma or treated ocular hypertension (OH) at referral or during the follow-up period. Positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated using different hypothetical thresholds for age and IOP-levels. Long-term follow-up was used to evaluate whether the first visit diagnoses would change over time, and if this would affect the effectiveness of the referrals. Results: Elevated IOP was the only referral criterion in 84% (n=79). In 28 patients (35%) among the IOP-only referrals, no ocular disease was found, and 26 patients (33%) had a positive outcome at the first visit. Median follow-up time was 6.4 years. PPV according to diagnosis after follow-up was 42% (95% CI: 32–54%) for IOP-only referrals. Including thresholds of ≥45 years of age in combination with an IOP of ≥25 mmHg in the referral criteria would have reduced the number of IOP-only referrals by 27% (21 of 79), and increased the PPV to 57% (95% CI: 45–71%) at the last visit. No positive outcome would have been missed, among those that were followed-up after the first visit, when applying these thresholds for referral, over a follow-up period of six years. Conclusion: Using only elevated IOP as referral criterion showed a poor accuracy for predicting those that require IOP lowering treatment. The long-term follow-up allowed us to verify the applicability of higher hypothetical threshold requirements on age and IOP for glaucoma referrals from optometric practices.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Guidelines, Long-term, Ophthalmology, Optometric practices, Sweden
in
Clinical Ophthalmology
volume
15
pages
9 pages
publisher
Dove Medical Press Ltd.
external identifiers
  • scopus:85111398163
  • pmid:34295143
ISSN
1177-5467
DOI
10.2147/OPTH.S318068
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
4a71d22f-b7ca-47e7-a58f-fa68d2fce8fb
date added to LUP
2021-08-31 15:52:05
date last changed
2024-04-20 10:21:58
@article{4a71d22f-b7ca-47e7-a58f-fa68d2fce8fb,
  abstract     = {{<p>Purpose: To evaluate the long-term predictive value of the need to treat patients referred by optometric practitioners, regarding glaucoma, in Malmö, Sweden, using intraocular pressure (IOP) as the primary referral criterion. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 94 of 108 (87%) individuals referred to the Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, Sweden, for elevated IOP during 2012– 2013. Data were extracted from patient records by the end of 2019. Positive outcome was defined as glaucoma, treated suspected glaucoma or treated ocular hypertension (OH) at referral or during the follow-up period. Positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated using different hypothetical thresholds for age and IOP-levels. Long-term follow-up was used to evaluate whether the first visit diagnoses would change over time, and if this would affect the effectiveness of the referrals. Results: Elevated IOP was the only referral criterion in 84% (n=79). In 28 patients (35%) among the IOP-only referrals, no ocular disease was found, and 26 patients (33%) had a positive outcome at the first visit. Median follow-up time was 6.4 years. PPV according to diagnosis after follow-up was 42% (95% CI: 32–54%) for IOP-only referrals. Including thresholds of ≥45 years of age in combination with an IOP of ≥25 mmHg in the referral criteria would have reduced the number of IOP-only referrals by 27% (21 of 79), and increased the PPV to 57% (95% CI: 45–71%) at the last visit. No positive outcome would have been missed, among those that were followed-up after the first visit, when applying these thresholds for referral, over a follow-up period of six years. Conclusion: Using only elevated IOP as referral criterion showed a poor accuracy for predicting those that require IOP lowering treatment. The long-term follow-up allowed us to verify the applicability of higher hypothetical threshold requirements on age and IOP for glaucoma referrals from optometric practices.</p>}},
  author       = {{Nilsson, Andreas G. and Peters, Dorothea}},
  issn         = {{1177-5467}},
  keywords     = {{Guidelines; Long-term; Ophthalmology; Optometric practices; Sweden}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{3041--3049}},
  publisher    = {{Dove Medical Press Ltd.}},
  series       = {{Clinical Ophthalmology}},
  title        = {{Effectiveness of elevated intraocular pressure as a criterion for glaucoma referral after 6 years of follow-up}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S318068}},
  doi          = {{10.2147/OPTH.S318068}},
  volume       = {{15}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}