Om distinktioner mellan klassisk och modern retorik
(2014) In Rhetorica Scandinavica 68. p.15-30- Abstract
- The article has become a classic in american rhetorical scholarship. It criticizes four major misconceptions about classical rhetoric often found in contemporary rhetorical scholarship. The misconceptions are traced to an incomplete and faulty understanding of Aristotle's rhetoric.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/5042630
- author
- Lunsford, A. and Ede, L. S.
- translator
- Eriksson, Anders LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2014
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Classical rhetoric, Modern rhetoric, Aristotle, Burke, Grimaldi, enthymeme
- in
- Rhetorica Scandinavica
- volume
- 68
- pages
- 15 - 30
- publisher
- Retorikförlaget
- ISSN
- 1397-0534
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 61a3cc1b-4983-496a-91b5-cbd4a09e4454 (old id 5042630)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 13:26:16
- date last changed
- 2020-06-15 14:45:00
@article{61a3cc1b-4983-496a-91b5-cbd4a09e4454, abstract = {{The article has become a classic in american rhetorical scholarship. It criticizes four major misconceptions about classical rhetoric often found in contemporary rhetorical scholarship. The misconceptions are traced to an incomplete and faulty understanding of Aristotle's rhetoric.}}, author = {{Eriksson, Anders and Lunsford, A. and Ede, L. S.}}, issn = {{1397-0534}}, keywords = {{Classical rhetoric; Modern rhetoric; Aristotle; Burke; Grimaldi; enthymeme}}, language = {{eng}}, pages = {{15--30}}, publisher = {{Retorikförlaget}}, series = {{Rhetorica Scandinavica}}, title = {{Om distinktioner mellan klassisk och modern retorik}}, volume = {{68}}, year = {{2014}}, }