Automating algebraic proof systems is NP-hard
(2021) 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2021 In Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing p.209-222- Abstract
We show that algebraic proofs are hard to find: Given an unsatisfiable CNF formula F, it is NP-hard to find a refutation of F in the Nullstellensatz, Polynomial Calculus, or Sherali-Adams proof systems in time polynomial in the size of the shortest such refutation. Our work extends, and gives a simplified proof of, the recent breakthrough of Atserias and Müller (JACM 2020) that established an analogous result for Resolution.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/507bd8d5-7425-4048-9c53-4dec51f53d11
- author
- De Rezende, Susanna F.
LU
; Göös, Mika
; Nordström, Jakob
LU
; Pitassi, Toniann
; Robere, Robert
and Sokolov, Dmitry
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2021
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- algebraic proof systems, automatability, lower bounds, pigeonhole principle, proof complexity
- host publication
- STOC 2021 - Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing
- series title
- Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
- editor
- Khuller, Samir and Williams, Virginia Vassilevska
- pages
- 14 pages
- publisher
- Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- conference name
- 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2021
- conference location
- Virtual, Online, Italy
- conference dates
- 2021-06-21 - 2021-06-25
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85108167467
- ISSN
- 0737-8017
- ISBN
- 9781450380539
- DOI
- 10.1145/3406325.3451080
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 507bd8d5-7425-4048-9c53-4dec51f53d11
- date added to LUP
- 2021-07-15 13:38:44
- date last changed
- 2025-10-14 09:52:20
@inproceedings{507bd8d5-7425-4048-9c53-4dec51f53d11,
abstract = {{<p>We show that algebraic proofs are hard to find: Given an unsatisfiable CNF formula F, it is NP-hard to find a refutation of F in the Nullstellensatz, Polynomial Calculus, or Sherali-Adams proof systems in time polynomial in the size of the shortest such refutation. Our work extends, and gives a simplified proof of, the recent breakthrough of Atserias and Müller (JACM 2020) that established an analogous result for Resolution. </p>}},
author = {{De Rezende, Susanna F. and Göös, Mika and Nordström, Jakob and Pitassi, Toniann and Robere, Robert and Sokolov, Dmitry}},
booktitle = {{STOC 2021 - Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing}},
editor = {{Khuller, Samir and Williams, Virginia Vassilevska}},
isbn = {{9781450380539}},
issn = {{0737-8017}},
keywords = {{algebraic proof systems; automatability; lower bounds; pigeonhole principle; proof complexity}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{209--222}},
publisher = {{Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)}},
series = {{Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing}},
title = {{Automating algebraic proof systems is NP-hard}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3406325.3451080}},
doi = {{10.1145/3406325.3451080}},
year = {{2021}},
}