Implementing clinical guidelines for co-occurring substance use and major mental disorders in Swedish forensic psychiatry : An exploratory, qualitative interview study with mental health care staff
(2023) In Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 144.- Abstract
Introduction: Patients with substance use disorders (SUD) and co-occurring mental disorders (COD) within forensic psychiatric care often suffer poor treatment outcomes and high rates of criminal recidivism, substance use, and psychiatric problems. This study aimed to describe the conditions for, and mental health care staff's experiences with, implementing integrated SUD-focused clinical guidelines, including assessment and treatment for patients with COD at a high-security forensic mental health services (FMHS) facility in Sweden. Methods: Study staff conducted nineteen semi-structured interviews with health care staff experienced in administering the new SUD assessment and treatment. The study conducted a thematic analysis to describe... (More)
Introduction: Patients with substance use disorders (SUD) and co-occurring mental disorders (COD) within forensic psychiatric care often suffer poor treatment outcomes and high rates of criminal recidivism, substance use, and psychiatric problems. This study aimed to describe the conditions for, and mental health care staff's experiences with, implementing integrated SUD-focused clinical guidelines, including assessment and treatment for patients with COD at a high-security forensic mental health services (FMHS) facility in Sweden. Methods: Study staff conducted nineteen semi-structured interviews with health care staff experienced in administering the new SUD assessment and treatment. The study conducted a thematic analysis to describe the health care staff's experiences with these guidelines and suggestions for improvement. Results: Most participants reported appreciation for the implementation of clinical guidelines with an SUD focus, an area they considered to have previously been neglected, but also noted the need for more practical guidance in the administration of the assessments. Participants reported the dual roles of caregiver and warden as difficult to reconcile and a similar, hindering division was also present in the health care staff's attitudes toward SUD. Participants' reports also described an imbalance prior to the implementation, whereby SUD was rarely assessed but treatment was still initiated. One year after the implementation, an imbalance still existed, but in reverse: SUD was more frequently assessed, but treatment was difficult to initiate. Conclusions: Despite indications of some ambivalence among staff regarding the necessity of the assessment and treatment guidelines, many participants considered it helpful to have a structured way to assess and treat SUD in this patient group. The imbalance between frequent assessment and infrequent treatment may have been due to difficulties transitioning patients across the “gap” between assessment and treatment. To bridge this gap, mental health services should make efforts to increase patients' insight concerning their SUD, flexibility in the administration of treatment, and the motivational skills of the health care staff working with this patient group. Participants considered important for enhancing treatment quality a shared knowledge base regarding SUD, and increased collaboration between different professions and between in- and outpatient services.
(Less)
- author
- Green, J. ; Bagge, A. S.Lindqvist ; Olausson, S. ; Andiné, P. ; Wallinius, M. LU and Karlén, M. Hildebrand
- organization
- publishing date
- 2023-01
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Clinical guidelines, Co-occurring diagnoses, Community reinforcement approach, Implementation, Substance use disorder, Thematic analysis
- in
- Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
- volume
- 144
- article number
- 108899
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85140328010
- pmid:36270196
- ISSN
- 0740-5472
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108899
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 521679dd-b5ce-4c19-bca4-636fbda6a70a
- date added to LUP
- 2023-01-23 14:15:26
- date last changed
- 2024-06-25 19:56:32
@article{521679dd-b5ce-4c19-bca4-636fbda6a70a,
abstract = {{<p>Introduction: Patients with substance use disorders (SUD) and co-occurring mental disorders (COD) within forensic psychiatric care often suffer poor treatment outcomes and high rates of criminal recidivism, substance use, and psychiatric problems. This study aimed to describe the conditions for, and mental health care staff's experiences with, implementing integrated SUD-focused clinical guidelines, including assessment and treatment for patients with COD at a high-security forensic mental health services (FMHS) facility in Sweden. Methods: Study staff conducted nineteen semi-structured interviews with health care staff experienced in administering the new SUD assessment and treatment. The study conducted a thematic analysis to describe the health care staff's experiences with these guidelines and suggestions for improvement. Results: Most participants reported appreciation for the implementation of clinical guidelines with an SUD focus, an area they considered to have previously been neglected, but also noted the need for more practical guidance in the administration of the assessments. Participants reported the dual roles of caregiver and warden as difficult to reconcile and a similar, hindering division was also present in the health care staff's attitudes toward SUD. Participants' reports also described an imbalance prior to the implementation, whereby SUD was rarely assessed but treatment was still initiated. One year after the implementation, an imbalance still existed, but in reverse: SUD was more frequently assessed, but treatment was difficult to initiate. Conclusions: Despite indications of some ambivalence among staff regarding the necessity of the assessment and treatment guidelines, many participants considered it helpful to have a structured way to assess and treat SUD in this patient group. The imbalance between frequent assessment and infrequent treatment may have been due to difficulties transitioning patients across the “gap” between assessment and treatment. To bridge this gap, mental health services should make efforts to increase patients' insight concerning their SUD, flexibility in the administration of treatment, and the motivational skills of the health care staff working with this patient group. Participants considered important for enhancing treatment quality a shared knowledge base regarding SUD, and increased collaboration between different professions and between in- and outpatient services.</p>}},
author = {{Green, J. and Bagge, A. S.Lindqvist and Olausson, S. and Andiné, P. and Wallinius, M. and Karlén, M. Hildebrand}},
issn = {{0740-5472}},
keywords = {{Clinical guidelines; Co-occurring diagnoses; Community reinforcement approach; Implementation; Substance use disorder; Thematic analysis}},
language = {{eng}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment}},
title = {{Implementing clinical guidelines for co-occurring substance use and major mental disorders in Swedish forensic psychiatry : An exploratory, qualitative interview study with mental health care staff}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108899}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108899}},
volume = {{144}},
year = {{2023}},
}