Advanced

Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening.

Dondorp, Wybo; de Wert, Guido; Bombard, Yvonne; Bianchi, Diana W; Bergmann, Carsten; Borry, Pascal; Chitty, Lyn S; Fellmann, Florence; Forzano, Francesca and Hall, Alison, et al. (2015) In European Journal of Human Genetics 23(11). p.1438-1450
Abstract
This paper contains a joint ESHG/ASHG position document with recommendations regarding responsible innovation in prenatal screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). By virtue of its greater accuracy and safety with respect to prenatal screening for common autosomal aneuploidies, NIPT has the potential of helping the practice better achieve its aim of facilitating autonomous reproductive choices, provided that balanced pretest information and non-directive counseling are available as part of the screening offer. Depending on the health-care setting, different scenarios for NIPT-based screening for common autosomal aneuploidies are possible. The trade-offs involved in these scenarios should be assessed in light of the aim of... (More)
This paper contains a joint ESHG/ASHG position document with recommendations regarding responsible innovation in prenatal screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). By virtue of its greater accuracy and safety with respect to prenatal screening for common autosomal aneuploidies, NIPT has the potential of helping the practice better achieve its aim of facilitating autonomous reproductive choices, provided that balanced pretest information and non-directive counseling are available as part of the screening offer. Depending on the health-care setting, different scenarios for NIPT-based screening for common autosomal aneuploidies are possible. The trade-offs involved in these scenarios should be assessed in light of the aim of screening, the balance of benefits and burdens for pregnant women and their partners and considerations of cost-effectiveness and justice. With improving screening technologies and decreasing costs of sequencing and analysis, it will become possible in the near future to significantly expand the scope of prenatal screening beyond common autosomal aneuploidies. Commercial providers have already begun expanding their tests to include sex-chromosomal abnormalities and microdeletions. However, multiple false positives may undermine the main achievement of NIPT in the context of prenatal screening: the significant reduction of the invasive testing rate. This document argues for a cautious expansion of the scope of prenatal screening to serious congenital and childhood disorders, only following sound validation studies and a comprehensive evaluation of all relevant aspects. A further core message of this document is that in countries where prenatal screening is offered as a public health programme, governments and public health authorities should adopt an active role to ensure the responsible innovation of prenatal screening on the basis of ethical principles. Crucial elements are the quality of the screening process as a whole (including non-laboratory aspects such as information and counseling), education of professionals, systematic evaluation of all aspects of prenatal screening, development of better evaluation tools in the light of the aim of the practice, accountability to all stakeholders including children born from screened pregnancies and persons living with the conditions targeted in prenatal screening and promotion of equity of access.European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 18 March 2015; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.57. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
, et al. (More)
(Less)
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
European Journal of Human Genetics
volume
23
issue
11
pages
1438 - 1450
publisher
Nature Publishing Group
external identifiers
  • pmid:25782669
  • wos:000362916200005
  • scopus:84944352609
ISSN
1476-5438
DOI
10.1038/ejhg.2015.57
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
f055b922-6ca7-4664-a14f-35dfdfc06f31 (old id 5258330)
alternative location
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25782669?dopt=Abstract
date added to LUP
2015-04-05 19:25:41
date last changed
2017-11-19 03:19:43
@article{f055b922-6ca7-4664-a14f-35dfdfc06f31,
  abstract     = {This paper contains a joint ESHG/ASHG position document with recommendations regarding responsible innovation in prenatal screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). By virtue of its greater accuracy and safety with respect to prenatal screening for common autosomal aneuploidies, NIPT has the potential of helping the practice better achieve its aim of facilitating autonomous reproductive choices, provided that balanced pretest information and non-directive counseling are available as part of the screening offer. Depending on the health-care setting, different scenarios for NIPT-based screening for common autosomal aneuploidies are possible. The trade-offs involved in these scenarios should be assessed in light of the aim of screening, the balance of benefits and burdens for pregnant women and their partners and considerations of cost-effectiveness and justice. With improving screening technologies and decreasing costs of sequencing and analysis, it will become possible in the near future to significantly expand the scope of prenatal screening beyond common autosomal aneuploidies. Commercial providers have already begun expanding their tests to include sex-chromosomal abnormalities and microdeletions. However, multiple false positives may undermine the main achievement of NIPT in the context of prenatal screening: the significant reduction of the invasive testing rate. This document argues for a cautious expansion of the scope of prenatal screening to serious congenital and childhood disorders, only following sound validation studies and a comprehensive evaluation of all relevant aspects. A further core message of this document is that in countries where prenatal screening is offered as a public health programme, governments and public health authorities should adopt an active role to ensure the responsible innovation of prenatal screening on the basis of ethical principles. Crucial elements are the quality of the screening process as a whole (including non-laboratory aspects such as information and counseling), education of professionals, systematic evaluation of all aspects of prenatal screening, development of better evaluation tools in the light of the aim of the practice, accountability to all stakeholders including children born from screened pregnancies and persons living with the conditions targeted in prenatal screening and promotion of equity of access.European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 18 March 2015; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.57.},
  author       = {Dondorp, Wybo and de Wert, Guido and Bombard, Yvonne and Bianchi, Diana W and Bergmann, Carsten and Borry, Pascal and Chitty, Lyn S and Fellmann, Florence and Forzano, Francesca and Hall, Alison and Henneman, Lidewij and Howard, Heidi C and Lucassen, Anneke and Ormond, Kelly and Peterlin, Borut and Radojkovic, Dragica and Rogowski, Wolf and Soller, Maria and Tibben, Aad and Tranebjærg, Lisbeth and van El, Carla G and Cornel, Martina C},
  issn         = {1476-5438},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {11},
  pages        = {1438--1450},
  publisher    = {Nature Publishing Group},
  series       = {European Journal of Human Genetics},
  title        = {Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening.},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2015.57},
  volume       = {23},
  year         = {2015},
}