Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Arguments Surrounding Organic and Genetically Modified Food Labelling: A Few Comparisons

Klintman, Mikael LU orcid (2002) In Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 4(3). p.247-259
Abstract
This paper compares reasoning surrounding organic food labelling with arguments concerning mandatory GM labelling. Focus is placed on argumentative cross-overs, defined as cases where actors or organizations use a certain type of argumentation for one issue (for example, modes of food production), and shift into using their opponent's type of argumentation for a closely related issue (for example, food labelling). The paper is a textual analysis of the arguments across non-governmental organizations, scientists, policy-makers and corporations. Argumentative cross-overs are not only of theoretical interest. They run the risk of, for instance, making consumers assume that all struggles for 'stricter food labelling' will lead to more reliable... (More)
This paper compares reasoning surrounding organic food labelling with arguments concerning mandatory GM labelling. Focus is placed on argumentative cross-overs, defined as cases where actors or organizations use a certain type of argumentation for one issue (for example, modes of food production), and shift into using their opponent's type of argumentation for a closely related issue (for example, food labelling). The paper is a textual analysis of the arguments across non-governmental organizations, scientists, policy-makers and corporations. Argumentative cross-overs are not only of theoretical interest. They run the risk of, for instance, making consumers assume that all struggles for 'stricter food labelling' will lead to more reliable labelling information and to a higher level of consumer empowerment. It is important to call for more nuanced descripticns of food labelling, and to make the public aware of the cross-overs, which often involve vast exaggerations of what food labelling can, or cannat, tell us. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
cross-over, critical realism, epistemic relativism
in
Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning
volume
4
issue
3
pages
247 - 259
publisher
Routledge
external identifiers
  • scopus:4344707051
ISSN
1523-908X
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
538f826c-2b18-4130-a846-9d264bf5bf9c (old id 1386453)
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 12:30:55
date last changed
2022-03-24 02:34:07
@article{538f826c-2b18-4130-a846-9d264bf5bf9c,
  abstract     = {{This paper compares reasoning surrounding organic food labelling with arguments concerning mandatory GM labelling. Focus is placed on argumentative cross-overs, defined as cases where actors or organizations use a certain type of argumentation for one issue (for example, modes of food production), and shift into using their opponent's type of argumentation for a closely related issue (for example, food labelling). The paper is a textual analysis of the arguments across non-governmental organizations, scientists, policy-makers and corporations. Argumentative cross-overs are not only of theoretical interest. They run the risk of, for instance, making consumers assume that all struggles for 'stricter food labelling' will lead to more reliable labelling information and to a higher level of consumer empowerment. It is important to call for more nuanced descripticns of food labelling, and to make the public aware of the cross-overs, which often involve vast exaggerations of what food labelling can, or cannat, tell us.}},
  author       = {{Klintman, Mikael}},
  issn         = {{1523-908X}},
  keywords     = {{cross-over; critical realism; epistemic relativism}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{247--259}},
  publisher    = {{Routledge}},
  series       = {{Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning}},
  title        = {{Arguments Surrounding Organic and Genetically Modified Food Labelling: A Few Comparisons}},
  volume       = {{4}},
  year         = {{2002}},
}