When is any agent a moral agent?: reflections on machine consciousness and moral agency
(2013) In International Journal of Machine Consciousness 5(1). p.105-129- Abstract
- In this paper, we take moral agency to be that context in which a particular agent can, appropriately, be held responsible for her actions and their consequences. In order to understand moral agency, we will discuss what it would take for an artifact to be a moral agent. For reasons that will become clear over the course of the paper, we take the artifactual question to be a useful way into discussion but ultimately misleading. We set out a number of conceptual preconditions for being a moral agent and then outline how one should – and should not – go about attributing moral agency. In place of a litmus test for such agency – such as Colin Allen et al ’s Moral Turing Test – we suggest some tools from conceptual spaces theory and the... (More)
- In this paper, we take moral agency to be that context in which a particular agent can, appropriately, be held responsible for her actions and their consequences. In order to understand moral agency, we will discuss what it would take for an artifact to be a moral agent. For reasons that will become clear over the course of the paper, we take the artifactual question to be a useful way into discussion but ultimately misleading. We set out a number of conceptual preconditions for being a moral agent and then outline how one should – and should not – go about attributing moral agency. In place of a litmus test for such agency – such as Colin Allen et al ’s Moral Turing Test – we suggest some tools from conceptual spaces theory and the unified conceptual space theory for mapping out the nature and extent of that agency. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/3412193
- author
- Parthemore, Joel LU and Whitby, Blay
- organization
- publishing date
- 2013
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- moral agency, Moral Turing Test, self, akrasia, concepts, conceptual spaces
- in
- International Journal of Machine Consciousness
- volume
- 5
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 105 - 129
- publisher
- World Scientific Publishing
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:84879342543
- ISSN
- 1793-8430
- project
- Centre for Cognitive Semiotics (RJ)
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 55c490f7-5ea7-4f8d-902a-43afa73d6acd (old id 3412193)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 08:48:46
- date last changed
- 2023-11-29 22:03:54
@article{55c490f7-5ea7-4f8d-902a-43afa73d6acd,
abstract = {{In this paper, we take moral agency to be that context in which a particular agent can, appropriately, be held responsible for her actions and their consequences. In order to understand moral agency, we will discuss what it would take for an artifact to be a moral agent. For reasons that will become clear over the course of the paper, we take the artifactual question to be a useful way into discussion but ultimately misleading. We set out a number of conceptual preconditions for being a moral agent and then outline how one should – and should not – go about attributing moral agency. In place of a litmus test for such agency – such as Colin Allen et al ’s Moral Turing Test – we suggest some tools from conceptual spaces theory and the unified conceptual space theory for mapping out the nature and extent of that agency.}},
author = {{Parthemore, Joel and Whitby, Blay}},
issn = {{1793-8430}},
keywords = {{moral agency; Moral Turing Test; self; akrasia; concepts; conceptual spaces}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{105--129}},
publisher = {{World Scientific Publishing}},
series = {{International Journal of Machine Consciousness}},
title = {{When is any agent a moral agent?: reflections on machine consciousness and moral agency}},
volume = {{5}},
year = {{2013}},
}