Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Using Quotas as a Remedy for Structural Injustice

Barabás, György and Szigeti, András LU (2023) In Erkenntnis 88(8). p.3631-3649
Abstract

We analyze a frequent but undertheorized form of structural injustice, one that arises due to the difficulty of reaching numerically equitable representation of underrepresented subgroups within a larger group. This form of structural injustice is significant because it could occur even if it were possible to completely eliminate bias and overt discrimination from hiring and recruitment practices. The conceptual toolkit we develop can be used to analyze such situations and propose remedies. Specifically, based on a simple mathematical model, we offer a new argument in favour of quotas, explore implications for policy-making, and consider the wider philosophical significance of the problem. We show that in order to reach more equitable... (More)

We analyze a frequent but undertheorized form of structural injustice, one that arises due to the difficulty of reaching numerically equitable representation of underrepresented subgroups within a larger group. This form of structural injustice is significant because it could occur even if it were possible to completely eliminate bias and overt discrimination from hiring and recruitment practices. The conceptual toolkit we develop can be used to analyze such situations and propose remedies. Specifically, based on a simple mathematical model, we offer a new argument in favour of quotas, explore implications for policy-making, and consider the wider philosophical significance of the problem. We show that in order to reach more equitable representations, quota-based recruitment may often be practically unavoidable. Assuming that members of groups in statistical minority are more likely to quit due to their marginalization, their proportions can stabilize at a low level, preventing a shift towards more equal representation and conserving the minority status of the subgroup. We show that this argument has important implications for addressing, preventing, and remediating the structural injustice of unfair representation.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Erkenntnis
volume
88
issue
8
pages
3631 - 3649
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • scopus:85124761250
ISSN
0165-0106
DOI
10.1007/s10670-022-00520-2
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
565b389b-c728-434b-98ab-eebb65e9c42f
date added to LUP
2022-04-14 10:35:25
date last changed
2024-01-09 15:48:06
@article{565b389b-c728-434b-98ab-eebb65e9c42f,
  abstract     = {{<p>We analyze a frequent but undertheorized form of structural injustice, one that arises due to the difficulty of reaching numerically equitable representation of underrepresented subgroups within a larger group. This form of structural injustice is significant because it could occur even if it were possible to completely eliminate bias and overt discrimination from hiring and recruitment practices. The conceptual toolkit we develop can be used to analyze such situations and propose remedies. Specifically, based on a simple mathematical model, we offer a new argument in favour of quotas, explore implications for policy-making, and consider the wider philosophical significance of the problem. We show that in order to reach more equitable representations, quota-based recruitment may often be practically unavoidable. Assuming that members of groups in statistical minority are more likely to quit due to their marginalization, their proportions can stabilize at a low level, preventing a shift towards more equal representation and conserving the minority status of the subgroup. We show that this argument has important implications for addressing, preventing, and remediating the structural injustice of unfair representation.</p>}},
  author       = {{Barabás, György and Szigeti, András}},
  issn         = {{0165-0106}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{8}},
  pages        = {{3631--3649}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{Erkenntnis}},
  title        = {{Using Quotas as a Remedy for Structural Injustice}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00520-2}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s10670-022-00520-2}},
  volume       = {{88}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}