Towards a Theory of Pure Procedural Climate Justice
(2019) In Journal of Applied Philosophy 36(5). p.785-799- Abstract
- A challenge for the theorising of climate justice is that even when the agents whose actions are supposed to be regulated are cooperative and act in good faith, they may still disagree about how the burdens and benefits of dealing with climate change should be distributed. This article is a contribution to the formulation of a useful role for normative theorising in light of this bounded nature of climate justice. We outline a theory of pure procedural climate justice; its content, function in relation to international climate diplomacy, and justification. The theory is ‘pure' in the sense that it does not rely on an independent criterion of what are just outcomes in negotiations of climate responsibilities. Rather, it specifies procedural... (More)
- A challenge for the theorising of climate justice is that even when the agents whose actions are supposed to be regulated are cooperative and act in good faith, they may still disagree about how the burdens and benefits of dealing with climate change should be distributed. This article is a contribution to the formulation of a useful role for normative theorising in light of this bounded nature of climate justice. We outline a theory of pure procedural climate justice; its content, function in relation to international climate diplomacy, and justification. The theory is ‘pure' in the sense that it does not rely on an independent criterion of what are just outcomes in negotiations of climate responsibilities. Rather, it specifies procedural fairness norms, such as transparency, reciprocity and participation, which make the process of negotiation fair independently of which account of substantive climate justice happens to be correct. Such procedural fairness norms are justified in part by being expressions of an ideal of a reasonable negotiator, an ideal which itself commands respect. They are also justified as means to an effective coordinated response to dangerous climate change in virtue of their capacity to create trust, predictability and accountability. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/5843805c-ca79-4988-8bcd-874da360d735
- author
- Brandstedt, Eric LU and Brülde, Bengt
- organization
- publishing date
- 2019-03-12
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Journal of Applied Philosophy
- volume
- 36
- issue
- 5
- pages
- 785 - 799
- publisher
- Wiley
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85062978460
- ISSN
- 0264-3758
- DOI
- 10.1111/japp.12357
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 5843805c-ca79-4988-8bcd-874da360d735
- date added to LUP
- 2019-03-13 15:33:46
- date last changed
- 2022-04-25 21:42:25
@article{5843805c-ca79-4988-8bcd-874da360d735,
abstract = {{A challenge for the theorising of climate justice is that even when the agents whose actions are supposed to be regulated are cooperative and act in good faith, they may still disagree about how the burdens and benefits of dealing with climate change should be distributed. This article is a contribution to the formulation of a useful role for normative theorising in light of this bounded nature of climate justice. We outline a theory of pure procedural climate justice; its content, function in relation to international climate diplomacy, and justification. The theory is ‘pure' in the sense that it does not rely on an independent criterion of what are just outcomes in negotiations of climate responsibilities. Rather, it specifies procedural fairness norms, such as transparency, reciprocity and participation, which make the process of negotiation fair independently of which account of substantive climate justice happens to be correct. Such procedural fairness norms are justified in part by being expressions of an ideal of a reasonable negotiator, an ideal which itself commands respect. They are also justified as means to an effective coordinated response to dangerous climate change in virtue of their capacity to create trust, predictability and accountability.}},
author = {{Brandstedt, Eric and Brülde, Bengt}},
issn = {{0264-3758}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{03}},
number = {{5}},
pages = {{785--799}},
publisher = {{Wiley}},
series = {{Journal of Applied Philosophy}},
title = {{Towards a Theory of Pure Procedural Climate Justice}},
url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/61954834/Towards_a_Theory_of_Pure_Procedural_Climate_Justice_Postprint_version.pdf}},
doi = {{10.1111/japp.12357}},
volume = {{36}},
year = {{2019}},
}