Философия истории в аналитической традиции
Gåvertsson, Frits LU
and Myurberg, Irina
(2017)
In History of Philosophy/Istoriya Filosofii
22(1).
p.78-91
- Abstract
- The aim of the article is, according to the author, to present history of philosophy (and philoso-phy of history) in terms of the British analytical tradition. Rejection of metahistorical purpose accounts for the importance of transdisciplinary analysis in the effort to make sense of historicism; thus, inner “duality” of historiography becomes vital for combining individual and “objective” sides of research. Hence, the author’s interest in such topics as the hermeneutic “fusion of horizons”, Nietzsche-Weberian perspectivism and the latest interpretations of both (by Q. Skinner, A. Ayer, R. Koselleck, R. Rorty et al.). These and other methodological means have the purport of making room for multiple approaches, which reveal both the... (More)
- The aim of the article is, according to the author, to present history of philosophy (and philoso-phy of history) in terms of the British analytical tradition. Rejection of metahistorical purpose accounts for the importance of transdisciplinary analysis in the effort to make sense of historicism; thus, inner “duality” of historiography becomes vital for combining individual and “objective” sides of research. Hence, the author’s interest in such topics as the hermeneutic “fusion of horizons”, Nietzsche-Weberian perspectivism and the latest interpretations of both (by Q. Skinner, A. Ayer, R. Koselleck, R. Rorty et al.). These and other methodological means have the purport of making room for multiple approaches, which reveal both the creative potential of the analytical tradition and its problematic sides. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/58d1e8ee-9b8d-44a3-9880-0b9fe6c397ce
- author
- Gåvertsson, Frits
LU
- translator
- Myurberg, Irina
- organization
- alternative title
- Philosophy of History in the Analytic Tradition
- publishing date
- 2017
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- philosophy of history, analytical philosophy, history of philosophy, political theory, hermeneutics, historiophobia, perspectivism, rhetorical turn, evolutionism
- in
- History of Philosophy/Istoriya Filosofii
- volume
- 22
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 78 - 91
- ISSN
- 2074-5869
- DOI
- 10.21146/2074-5869-2017-22-1-78-91
- language
- Russian
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 58d1e8ee-9b8d-44a3-9880-0b9fe6c397ce
- date added to LUP
- 2017-09-01 08:53:34
- date last changed
- 2018-11-21 21:34:16
@article{58d1e8ee-9b8d-44a3-9880-0b9fe6c397ce,
abstract = {{The aim of the article is, according to the author, to present history of philosophy (and philoso-phy of history) in terms of the British analytical tradition. Rejection of metahistorical purpose accounts for the importance of transdisciplinary analysis in the effort to make sense of historicism; thus, inner “duality” of historiography becomes vital for combining individual and “objective” sides of research. Hence, the author’s interest in such topics as the hermeneutic “fusion of horizons”, Nietzsche-Weberian perspectivism and the latest interpretations of both (by Q. Skinner, A. Ayer, R. Koselleck, R. Rorty et al.). These and other methodological means have the purport of making room for multiple approaches, which reveal both the creative potential of the analytical tradition and its problematic sides.}},
author = {{Gåvertsson, Frits and Myurberg, Irina}},
issn = {{2074-5869}},
keywords = {{philosophy of history; analytical philosophy; history of philosophy; political theory; hermeneutics; historiophobia; perspectivism; rhetorical turn; evolutionism}},
language = {{rus}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{78--91}},
series = {{History of Philosophy/Istoriya Filosofii}},
title = {{Философия истории в аналитической традиции}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2017-22-1-78-91}},
doi = {{10.21146/2074-5869-2017-22-1-78-91}},
volume = {{22}},
year = {{2017}},
}