Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

EULAR Points to Consider (PtC) for designing, analysing and reporting of studies with work participation as an outcome domain in patients with inflammatory arthritis

Boonen, Annelies ; Putrik, Polina ; Marques, Mary Lucy ; Alunno, Alessia ; Abasolo, Lydia ; Beaton, Dorcas ; Betteridge, Neil ; Bjørk, Mathilda ; Boers, Maarten and Boteva, Boryana , et al. (2021) In Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 80(9). p.1116-1123
Abstract

Background: Clinical studies with work participation (WP) as an outcome domain pose particular methodological challenges that hamper interpretation, comparison between studies and meta-analyses. Objectives: To develop Points to Consider (PtC) for design, analysis and reporting of studies of patients with inflammatory arthritis that include WP as a primary or secondary outcome domain. Methods: The EULAR Standardised Operating Procedures were followed. A multidisciplinary taskforce with 22 experts including patients with rheumatic diseases, from 10 EULAR countries and Canada, identified methodologic areas of concern. Two systematic literature reviews (SLR) appraised the methodology across these areas. In parallel, two surveys among... (More)

Background: Clinical studies with work participation (WP) as an outcome domain pose particular methodological challenges that hamper interpretation, comparison between studies and meta-analyses. Objectives: To develop Points to Consider (PtC) for design, analysis and reporting of studies of patients with inflammatory arthritis that include WP as a primary or secondary outcome domain. Methods: The EULAR Standardised Operating Procedures were followed. A multidisciplinary taskforce with 22 experts including patients with rheumatic diseases, from 10 EULAR countries and Canada, identified methodologic areas of concern. Two systematic literature reviews (SLR) appraised the methodology across these areas. In parallel, two surveys among professional societies and experts outside the taskforce sought for additional methodological areas or existing conducting/reporting recommendations. The taskforce formulated the PtC after presentation of the SLRs and survey results, and discussion. Consensus was obtained through informal voting, with levels of agreement obtained anonymously. Results: Two overarching principles and nine PtC were formulated. The taskforce recommends to align the work-related study objective to the design, duration, and outcome domains/measurement instruments of the study (PtC: 1-3); to identify contextual factors upfront and account for them in analyses (PtC: 4); to account for interdependence of different work outcome domains and for changes in work status over time (PtC: 5-7); to present results as means as well as proportions of patients reaching predefined meaningful categories (PtC: 8) and to explicitly report volumes of productivity loss when costs are an outcome (PtC:9). Conclusion: Adherence to these EULAR PtC will improve the methodological quality of studies evaluating WP.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and , et al. (More)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and (Less)
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
ankylosing, arthritis, health care, outcome and process assessment, psoriatic, rheumatoid, spondylitis
in
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
volume
80
issue
9
article number
20219523
pages
1116 - 1123
publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
external identifiers
  • scopus:85104032349
  • pmid:33832966
ISSN
0003-4967
DOI
10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219523
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
5d1abe9e-4f39-43fa-8dda-79d44e31559e
date added to LUP
2021-04-23 07:56:11
date last changed
2024-04-20 05:13:51
@article{5d1abe9e-4f39-43fa-8dda-79d44e31559e,
  abstract     = {{<p>Background: Clinical studies with work participation (WP) as an outcome domain pose particular methodological challenges that hamper interpretation, comparison between studies and meta-analyses. Objectives: To develop Points to Consider (PtC) for design, analysis and reporting of studies of patients with inflammatory arthritis that include WP as a primary or secondary outcome domain. Methods: The EULAR Standardised Operating Procedures were followed. A multidisciplinary taskforce with 22 experts including patients with rheumatic diseases, from 10 EULAR countries and Canada, identified methodologic areas of concern. Two systematic literature reviews (SLR) appraised the methodology across these areas. In parallel, two surveys among professional societies and experts outside the taskforce sought for additional methodological areas or existing conducting/reporting recommendations. The taskforce formulated the PtC after presentation of the SLRs and survey results, and discussion. Consensus was obtained through informal voting, with levels of agreement obtained anonymously. Results: Two overarching principles and nine PtC were formulated. The taskforce recommends to align the work-related study objective to the design, duration, and outcome domains/measurement instruments of the study (PtC: 1-3); to identify contextual factors upfront and account for them in analyses (PtC: 4); to account for interdependence of different work outcome domains and for changes in work status over time (PtC: 5-7); to present results as means as well as proportions of patients reaching predefined meaningful categories (PtC: 8) and to explicitly report volumes of productivity loss when costs are an outcome (PtC:9). Conclusion: Adherence to these EULAR PtC will improve the methodological quality of studies evaluating WP. </p>}},
  author       = {{Boonen, Annelies and Putrik, Polina and Marques, Mary Lucy and Alunno, Alessia and Abasolo, Lydia and Beaton, Dorcas and Betteridge, Neil and Bjørk, Mathilda and Boers, Maarten and Boteva, Boryana and Fautrel, Bruno and Guillemin, Francis and Mateus, Elsa F. and Nikiphorou, Elena and Péntek, Márta and Pimentel Santos, Fernando and Severens, Johannes L. and Verstappen, Suzanne M.M. and Walker-Bone, Karen and Wallman, Johan Karlsson and Ter Wee, Marieke M. and Westhovens, René and Ramiro, Sofia}},
  issn         = {{0003-4967}},
  keywords     = {{ankylosing; arthritis; health care; outcome and process assessment; psoriatic; rheumatoid; spondylitis}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{9}},
  pages        = {{1116--1123}},
  publisher    = {{BMJ Publishing Group}},
  series       = {{Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases}},
  title        = {{EULAR Points to Consider (PtC) for designing, analysing and reporting of studies with work participation as an outcome domain in patients with inflammatory arthritis}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219523}},
  doi          = {{10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219523}},
  volume       = {{80}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}