COVID-19 herd immunity in the absence of a vaccine : an irresponsible approach
(2021) In Epidemiology and health 43.- Abstract
As severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread rapidly throughout the human population, the concept of "herd immunity" has attracted the attention of both decision-makers and the general public. In the absence of a vaccine, this entails that a large proportion of the population will be infected to develop immunity that would limit the severity and/or extent of subsequent outbreaks. We argue that adopting such an approach should be avoided for several reasons. There are significant uncertainties about whether achieving herd immunity is possible. If possible, achieving herd immunity would impose a large burden on society. There are gaps in protection, making it difficult to shield the vulnerable. It... (More)
As severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread rapidly throughout the human population, the concept of "herd immunity" has attracted the attention of both decision-makers and the general public. In the absence of a vaccine, this entails that a large proportion of the population will be infected to develop immunity that would limit the severity and/or extent of subsequent outbreaks. We argue that adopting such an approach should be avoided for several reasons. There are significant uncertainties about whether achieving herd immunity is possible. If possible, achieving herd immunity would impose a large burden on society. There are gaps in protection, making it difficult to shield the vulnerable. It would defeat the purpose of avoiding harm caused by the virus. Lastly, dozens of countries are showing that containment is possible.
(Less)
- author
- Khalife, Jade
LU
and VanGennep, Derrick
- organization
- publishing date
- 2021
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Coronavirus, Endemic diseases, Ethics, Herd immunity, Vaccines
- in
- Epidemiology and health
- volume
- 43
- article number
- e2021012
- publisher
- Korean Society of Epidemiology
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:33541010
- scopus:85103993755
- ISSN
- 2092-7193
- DOI
- 10.4178/epih.e2021012
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 5d21e70f-8a50-422a-8702-c83f0818c363
- date added to LUP
- 2021-04-21 08:14:49
- date last changed
- 2025-05-19 20:55:17
@article{5d21e70f-8a50-422a-8702-c83f0818c363, abstract = {{<p>As severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread rapidly throughout the human population, the concept of "herd immunity" has attracted the attention of both decision-makers and the general public. In the absence of a vaccine, this entails that a large proportion of the population will be infected to develop immunity that would limit the severity and/or extent of subsequent outbreaks. We argue that adopting such an approach should be avoided for several reasons. There are significant uncertainties about whether achieving herd immunity is possible. If possible, achieving herd immunity would impose a large burden on society. There are gaps in protection, making it difficult to shield the vulnerable. It would defeat the purpose of avoiding harm caused by the virus. Lastly, dozens of countries are showing that containment is possible.</p>}}, author = {{Khalife, Jade and VanGennep, Derrick}}, issn = {{2092-7193}}, keywords = {{Coronavirus; Endemic diseases; Ethics; Herd immunity; Vaccines}}, language = {{eng}}, publisher = {{Korean Society of Epidemiology}}, series = {{Epidemiology and health}}, title = {{COVID-19 herd immunity in the absence of a vaccine : an irresponsible approach}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2021012}}, doi = {{10.4178/epih.e2021012}}, volume = {{43}}, year = {{2021}}, }