Democratization and electoral turnovers in sub-Saharan Africa and beyond
(2014) In Democratization 21(2). p.220-243- Abstract
- This study criticizes approaches equating opposition electoral victories with democratization in competitive authoritarian regimes. Not only are these approaches theoretically problematic, but there are also important empirical reasons to distinguish between electoral turnovers and democratization. The study goes on to explain why some African turnovers have been successful in bringing about democratization while others have not. This study promotes an approach in which opposition victories may be used as an independent variable that, under certain circumstances, could promote democratization. Using evidence from the cases of Senegal, Ghana, and Kenya, it is argued that electoral uncertainty caused by a low level of party... (More)
- This study criticizes approaches equating opposition electoral victories with democratization in competitive authoritarian regimes. Not only are these approaches theoretically problematic, but there are also important empirical reasons to distinguish between electoral turnovers and democratization. The study goes on to explain why some African turnovers have been successful in bringing about democratization while others have not. This study promotes an approach in which opposition victories may be used as an independent variable that, under certain circumstances, could promote democratization. Using evidence from the cases of Senegal, Ghana, and Kenya, it is argued that electoral uncertainty caused by a low level of party institutionalization has been an important obstacle to democratization by alternation in the African context. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4353873
- author
- Wahman, Michael LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2014
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Africa, turnovers, Kenya, Senegal, Ghana, institutionalization, parties, elections
- in
- Democratization
- volume
- 21
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 220 - 243
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000333930300002
- scopus:84896849754
- ISSN
- 1351-0347
- DOI
- 10.1080/13510347.2012.732572
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 5ed73cae-ad26-45e0-a486-0181dcf0b98d (old id 4353873)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 10:21:55
- date last changed
- 2022-04-27 21:24:01
@article{5ed73cae-ad26-45e0-a486-0181dcf0b98d,
abstract = {{This study criticizes approaches equating opposition electoral victories with democratization in competitive authoritarian regimes. Not only are these approaches theoretically problematic, but there are also important empirical reasons to distinguish between electoral turnovers and democratization. The study goes on to explain why some African turnovers have been successful in bringing about democratization while others have not. This study promotes an approach in which opposition victories may be used as an independent variable that, under certain circumstances, could promote democratization. Using evidence from the cases of Senegal, Ghana, and Kenya, it is argued that electoral uncertainty caused by a low level of party institutionalization has been an important obstacle to democratization by alternation in the African context.}},
author = {{Wahman, Michael}},
issn = {{1351-0347}},
keywords = {{Africa; turnovers; Kenya; Senegal; Ghana; institutionalization; parties; elections}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{220--243}},
publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}},
series = {{Democratization}},
title = {{Democratization and electoral turnovers in sub-Saharan Africa and beyond}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.732572}},
doi = {{10.1080/13510347.2012.732572}},
volume = {{21}},
year = {{2014}},
}