Who Counts as a Sexual Subject? The Impact of Ableist Rhetoric for People with Intellectual Disability in Sweden
Bahner, Julia LU
; Gäddman Johansson, Richard
and Svanelöv, Eric
(2023)
In Sexuality Research and Social Policy
- Abstract
Introduction: The ableist rhetoric around sexuality in disability services and beyond can hinder subjective sexual expression and have a powerful impact on health, self-esteem, and everyday life through internalized ableism, structural marginalization, and interpersonal discrimination. The aim of this study was to explore the ableist rhetoric of sexuality and its impact on sexual scripting for people with intellectual disability. Methods: A thematic analysis was carried out on data generated through ethnographic fieldwork at five sheltered accommodations and semi-structured interviews with ten individuals with intellectual disability. Results: The results show that people in Sweden with intellectual disability are desexualized within a... (More)
Introduction: The ableist rhetoric around sexuality in disability services and beyond can hinder subjective sexual expression and have a powerful impact on health, self-esteem, and everyday life through internalized ableism, structural marginalization, and interpersonal discrimination. The aim of this study was to explore the ableist rhetoric of sexuality and its impact on sexual scripting for people with intellectual disability. Methods: A thematic analysis was carried out on data generated through ethnographic fieldwork at five sheltered accommodations and semi-structured interviews with ten individuals with intellectual disability. Results: The results show that people in Sweden with intellectual disability are desexualized within a moral order that is maintained in post-institutional social care. Through this moral order, which is deeply embedded in an ableist rhetoric about sexual relationships, sexual scripting for disabled people is constrained both inside post-institutional social care initiatives, and in the broader community of “ableist environments.” In response, disabled people employ various strategies of resistance. Conclusions: A rhetoric of positive sexuality should be a guiding principle for successfully supporting the development of sexual agency on each individual’s own term. Policy Implications: We conclude by encouraging the development of initiatives that will empower and support people with intellectual disability to learn about their sexual rights and to find solutions that allow for development of sexual agency and subjectivity.
(Less)
- author
- Bahner, Julia
LU
; Gäddman Johansson, Richard
and Svanelöv, Eric
- organization
- publishing date
- 2023-09-01
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- epub
- subject
- keywords
- Ableism, Intellectual disability, Post-institutional disability services, Sexual scripts, Sexuality
- in
- Sexuality Research and Social Policy
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85169313771
- ISSN
- 1868-9884
- DOI
- 10.1007/s13178-023-00873-5
- project
- Sexuality - an access issue
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).
- id
- 6173b61a-c0d0-4934-ad0b-83ee03732c02
- date added to LUP
- 2023-10-02 06:14:12
- date last changed
- 2023-11-14 17:21:52
@article{6173b61a-c0d0-4934-ad0b-83ee03732c02,
abstract = {{<p>Introduction: The ableist rhetoric around sexuality in disability services and beyond can hinder subjective sexual expression and have a powerful impact on health, self-esteem, and everyday life through internalized ableism, structural marginalization, and interpersonal discrimination. The aim of this study was to explore the ableist rhetoric of sexuality and its impact on sexual scripting for people with intellectual disability. Methods: A thematic analysis was carried out on data generated through ethnographic fieldwork at five sheltered accommodations and semi-structured interviews with ten individuals with intellectual disability. Results: The results show that people in Sweden with intellectual disability are desexualized within a moral order that is maintained in post-institutional social care. Through this moral order, which is deeply embedded in an ableist rhetoric about sexual relationships, sexual scripting for disabled people is constrained both inside post-institutional social care initiatives, and in the broader community of “ableist environments.” In response, disabled people employ various strategies of resistance. Conclusions: A rhetoric of positive sexuality should be a guiding principle for successfully supporting the development of sexual agency on each individual’s own term. Policy Implications: We conclude by encouraging the development of initiatives that will empower and support people with intellectual disability to learn about their sexual rights and to find solutions that allow for development of sexual agency and subjectivity.</p>}},
author = {{Bahner, Julia and Gäddman Johansson, Richard and Svanelöv, Eric}},
issn = {{1868-9884}},
keywords = {{Ableism; Intellectual disability; Post-institutional disability services; Sexual scripts; Sexuality}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{09}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{Sexuality Research and Social Policy}},
title = {{Who Counts as a Sexual Subject? The Impact of Ableist Rhetoric for People with Intellectual Disability in Sweden}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13178-023-00873-5}},
doi = {{10.1007/s13178-023-00873-5}},
year = {{2023}},
}