The Value in De-emphasizing Structure in Liquidity
(2020) In Marketing Theory- Abstract
- In the set of commentaries on liquidity entitled “The continuing significance of social structure in liquid modernity,” three sets of authors set out to examine the relationship between liquidity and structure, value, and distinction. In doing so, they attempt to marry theories which argue against sociologist Zygmunt Bauman’s central thesis that societal structures are shifting with his seminal construct of liquidity, an exercise that has mixed results. All three sets of authors have engaged with Bauman’s conceptualization of liquid modernity as well as our conceptualization of liquid consumption and its consequences. In this response to the commentaries, we clarify how we understand Bauman and how we have used his ideas in our theorizing,... (More)
- In the set of commentaries on liquidity entitled “The continuing significance of social structure in liquid modernity,” three sets of authors set out to examine the relationship between liquidity and structure, value, and distinction. In doing so, they attempt to marry theories which argue against sociologist Zygmunt Bauman’s central thesis that societal structures are shifting with his seminal construct of liquidity, an exercise that has mixed results. All three sets of authors have engaged with Bauman’s conceptualization of liquid modernity as well as our conceptualization of liquid consumption and its consequences. In this response to the commentaries, we clarify how we understand Bauman and how we have used his ideas in our theorizing, engage with the three sets of author’s advocacy for emphasizing the continuing relevance of structure within liquidity, and, finally, sum up how de-emphasizing structure has and can continue to lead to important new insights in marketing theory. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/61ec5a1c-1a3d-4b3c-9413-3156a8bf4446
- author
- Eckhardt, Giana M. and Bardhi, Fleura LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2020-08-03
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Bauman, consumption, liquid consumption, liquid modernity, marketing
- in
- Marketing Theory
- publisher
- SAGE Publications
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85088933298
- ISSN
- 1741-301X
- DOI
- 10.1177/1470593120941038
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 61ec5a1c-1a3d-4b3c-9413-3156a8bf4446
- date added to LUP
- 2020-11-04 13:33:34
- date last changed
- 2022-04-19 01:37:21
@article{61ec5a1c-1a3d-4b3c-9413-3156a8bf4446,
abstract = {{In the set of commentaries on liquidity entitled “The continuing significance of social structure in liquid modernity,” three sets of authors set out to examine the relationship between liquidity and structure, value, and distinction. In doing so, they attempt to marry theories which argue against sociologist Zygmunt Bauman’s central thesis that societal structures are shifting with his seminal construct of liquidity, an exercise that has mixed results. All three sets of authors have engaged with Bauman’s conceptualization of liquid modernity as well as our conceptualization of liquid consumption and its consequences. In this response to the commentaries, we clarify how we understand Bauman and how we have used his ideas in our theorizing, engage with the three sets of author’s advocacy for emphasizing the continuing relevance of structure within liquidity, and, finally, sum up how de-emphasizing structure has and can continue to lead to important new insights in marketing theory.}},
author = {{Eckhardt, Giana M. and Bardhi, Fleura}},
issn = {{1741-301X}},
keywords = {{Bauman; consumption; liquid consumption; liquid modernity; marketing}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{08}},
publisher = {{SAGE Publications}},
series = {{Marketing Theory}},
title = {{The Value in De-emphasizing Structure in Liquidity}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470593120941038}},
doi = {{10.1177/1470593120941038}},
year = {{2020}},
}