Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP)-a review of the literature and algorithm proposed for the diagnostic work-up of IAP

Aronen, Anu ; Guilabert, Lucía ; Hadi, Amer ; Kiudelis, Vytautas ; Panaitescu, Afrodita ; Wlodarczyk, Barbara ; Laukkarinen, Johanna ; Regner, Sara LU orcid and de-Madaria, Enrique (2024) In Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology 9.
Abstract

Background and Objective: This narrative review addresses idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) and its epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical course and treatment during the last decade. As there is no previously validated protocol for finding the aetiology of acute pancreatitis (AP), the primary aim of this study is to find, describe and unify evidence about the diagnostic work-up of AP to diagnose the true IAP. By finding the aetiology with the highest possible yield it may be possible to reduce recurrent AP (RAP) episodes and related morbidity and thereby decrease health care costs and possibly improve patients' quality of life. Methods: This narrative review includes articles retrieved from PubMed search with publications from 2013-2023.... (More)

Background and Objective: This narrative review addresses idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) and its epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical course and treatment during the last decade. As there is no previously validated protocol for finding the aetiology of acute pancreatitis (AP), the primary aim of this study is to find, describe and unify evidence about the diagnostic work-up of AP to diagnose the true IAP. By finding the aetiology with the highest possible yield it may be possible to reduce recurrent AP (RAP) episodes and related morbidity and thereby decrease health care costs and possibly improve patients' quality of life. Methods: This narrative review includes articles retrieved from PubMed search with publications from 2013-2023. Cross references were used when found relevant. Key Content and Findings: The rates of aetiologies of AP and the diagnostics performed behind these numbers vary widely between different studies, time periods and different geographical regions, as there is no unified algorithm in diagnostic work-up of IAP. In this study, we describe an up-to-date summary of epidemiology, diagnostic course and treatment of IAP, and propose an algorithm of IAP diagnostics in light of recent scientific studies and their outcomes and address possible treatments of IAP. Conclusions: Although aetiology is key for AP management, there is still no validated protocol for aetiological diagnosis. IAP is relevant due to its recurrence rate and possible evolution to chronic pancreatitis. We still need more studies addressing this topic and evaluating new diagnostic protocols with advanced tests and treatment strategies in true IAP.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
acute pancreatitis (AP), aetiology, Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP), management
in
Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology
volume
9
article number
9039
external identifiers
  • pmid:39503029
  • scopus:85207695858
DOI
10.21037/tgh-23-125
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
62d43a3a-c784-4996-88cb-593ce4bf7d83
date added to LUP
2024-12-10 15:03:23
date last changed
2025-07-09 08:11:40
@article{62d43a3a-c784-4996-88cb-593ce4bf7d83,
  abstract     = {{<p>Background and Objective: This narrative review addresses idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) and its epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical course and treatment during the last decade. As there is no previously validated protocol for finding the aetiology of acute pancreatitis (AP), the primary aim of this study is to find, describe and unify evidence about the diagnostic work-up of AP to diagnose the true IAP. By finding the aetiology with the highest possible yield it may be possible to reduce recurrent AP (RAP) episodes and related morbidity and thereby decrease health care costs and possibly improve patients' quality of life. Methods: This narrative review includes articles retrieved from PubMed search with publications from 2013-2023. Cross references were used when found relevant. Key Content and Findings: The rates of aetiologies of AP and the diagnostics performed behind these numbers vary widely between different studies, time periods and different geographical regions, as there is no unified algorithm in diagnostic work-up of IAP. In this study, we describe an up-to-date summary of epidemiology, diagnostic course and treatment of IAP, and propose an algorithm of IAP diagnostics in light of recent scientific studies and their outcomes and address possible treatments of IAP. Conclusions: Although aetiology is key for AP management, there is still no validated protocol for aetiological diagnosis. IAP is relevant due to its recurrence rate and possible evolution to chronic pancreatitis. We still need more studies addressing this topic and evaluating new diagnostic protocols with advanced tests and treatment strategies in true IAP.</p>}},
  author       = {{Aronen, Anu and Guilabert, Lucía and Hadi, Amer and Kiudelis, Vytautas and Panaitescu, Afrodita and Wlodarczyk, Barbara and Laukkarinen, Johanna and Regner, Sara and de-Madaria, Enrique}},
  keywords     = {{acute pancreatitis (AP); aetiology; Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP); management}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  series       = {{Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology}},
  title        = {{Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP)-a review of the literature and algorithm proposed for the diagnostic work-up of IAP}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tgh-23-125}},
  doi          = {{10.21037/tgh-23-125}},
  volume       = {{9}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}