Balancing innovation, 'ordre public' and morality in human germline editing : A call for more nuanced approaches in patent law
Matthews, Duncan ; Minssen, Timo LU and Nordberg, Ana LU
(2023)
p.241-267
- Abstract
This chapter analyses the role that 'ordre public' and morality exceptions can play in the granting of patents on inventions in the field of human germline editing and the consequences of this policy option. In order to provide the context for such an analysis, the chapter will, first, provide an overview of the current patent landscape for relevant genome editing technologies, drawing attention to recent patent disputes and, second, examine 'ordre public' and morality exceptions under patent law in international, national and regional law, and the implications for innovation and access to novel treatments. The chapter argues that patent exceptions should not be used as a blunt policy instrument, nor interpreted in a way that is... (More)
This chapter analyses the role that 'ordre public' and morality exceptions can play in the granting of patents on inventions in the field of human germline editing and the consequences of this policy option. In order to provide the context for such an analysis, the chapter will, first, provide an overview of the current patent landscape for relevant genome editing technologies, drawing attention to recent patent disputes and, second, examine 'ordre public' and morality exceptions under patent law in international, national and regional law, and the implications for innovation and access to novel treatments. The chapter argues that patent exceptions should not be used as a blunt policy instrument, nor interpreted in a way that is contrary to the patent system's overall objectives. The 'ordre public' and morality based exceptions in the context of human germline editing should not be interpreted and applied in a way which results in outcomes counterproductive to the goal of balancing innovation with the protection of societal higher normative values. Instead, the application of the exception should be based on a sound understanding of both the underlying science as well as the broader ethical, social, and legal implications, thus enabling case-by-case decisions that provide the basis for patent claim amendments and nuanced purpose-bound protection. Further analysis and debate as to the role that such flexibilities can play in the context of genome editing technologies is therefore both necessary and desirable, and can be facilitated in the ways set out in this chapter.
(Less)
- author
- Matthews, Duncan
; Minssen, Timo
LU
and Nordberg, Ana
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2023-03-06
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- CRISPR, Genome editing, Genome editing governance, Law and ethics, Morality exception, Patent law
- host publication
- Governing, Protecting, and Regulating the Future of Genome Editing : The Significance of ELSPI Perspectives - The Significance of ELSPI Perspectives
- pages
- 27 pages
- publisher
- Brill
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85195248389
- ISBN
- 9789004526082
- 9789004526136
- DOI
- 10.1163/9789004526136_013
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 63f509dc-16d0-4893-b062-f07fd381a00b
- date added to LUP
- 2024-10-09 11:29:13
- date last changed
- 2024-12-18 18:41:34
@inbook{63f509dc-16d0-4893-b062-f07fd381a00b,
abstract = {{<p>This chapter analyses the role that 'ordre public' and morality exceptions can play in the granting of patents on inventions in the field of human germline editing and the consequences of this policy option. In order to provide the context for such an analysis, the chapter will, first, provide an overview of the current patent landscape for relevant genome editing technologies, drawing attention to recent patent disputes and, second, examine 'ordre public' and morality exceptions under patent law in international, national and regional law, and the implications for innovation and access to novel treatments. The chapter argues that patent exceptions should not be used as a blunt policy instrument, nor interpreted in a way that is contrary to the patent system's overall objectives. The 'ordre public' and morality based exceptions in the context of human germline editing should not be interpreted and applied in a way which results in outcomes counterproductive to the goal of balancing innovation with the protection of societal higher normative values. Instead, the application of the exception should be based on a sound understanding of both the underlying science as well as the broader ethical, social, and legal implications, thus enabling case-by-case decisions that provide the basis for patent claim amendments and nuanced purpose-bound protection. Further analysis and debate as to the role that such flexibilities can play in the context of genome editing technologies is therefore both necessary and desirable, and can be facilitated in the ways set out in this chapter.</p>}},
author = {{Matthews, Duncan and Minssen, Timo and Nordberg, Ana}},
booktitle = {{Governing, Protecting, and Regulating the Future of Genome Editing : The Significance of ELSPI Perspectives}},
isbn = {{9789004526082}},
keywords = {{CRISPR; Genome editing; Genome editing governance; Law and ethics; Morality exception; Patent law}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{03}},
pages = {{241--267}},
publisher = {{Brill}},
title = {{Balancing innovation, 'ordre public' and morality in human germline editing : A call for more nuanced approaches in patent law}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004526136_013}},
doi = {{10.1163/9789004526136_013}},
year = {{2023}},
}