Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The Rise of Procedural Rule of Law in the European Union - Historical and Normative Foundations

Groussot, Xavier LU and Zemskova, Anna LU orcid (2021) In Swedish Studies in European Law
Abstract
The rule of law in the EU is not only substantive and formal, it is also procedural. From the early years of European integration until now – and this through the interpretative lens of either the terse Article 31 ECSC or the robust Article 19 TEU - the procedural rule of law has always been thriving and jolting in the case law of both the European Coal and Steal Community (ECSC) Court and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Yet, in the last years, the place of the procedural rule of law in the European jurisprudence has increased significantly with the help of the newly drafted Article 19 TEU (replacing Article 220 EC, ex article 164 EEC) and the entry into force of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and notably its... (More)
The rule of law in the EU is not only substantive and formal, it is also procedural. From the early years of European integration until now – and this through the interpretative lens of either the terse Article 31 ECSC or the robust Article 19 TEU - the procedural rule of law has always been thriving and jolting in the case law of both the European Coal and Steal Community (ECSC) Court and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Yet, in the last years, the place of the procedural rule of law in the European jurisprudence has increased significantly with the help of the newly drafted Article 19 TEU (replacing Article 220 EC, ex article 164 EEC) and the entry into force of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and notably its Article 47, which incorporates and codifies the general principle of effective judicial protection. Another reason of this contemporary rise of the procedural of law is the present ‘crisis context’ epitomized, for instance, by the state of economic emergency and the bailout case law of the CJEU. Claire Kilpatrick has relied on the concept of the procedural rule of law to show the malfunctioning of the EU judicial and administrative reviews of bailouts. Our contribution builds on her analysis, but is using a broader spectrum of investigation by not focusing merely on the situation of economic emergency and by tracing back the ‘procedural rule of law culture’ of the CJEU. We will inquire, therefore, the historical and normative foundations of the procedural rule of law by studying the roots of effet utile, effectiveness and effective judicial protection in the EU legal order and by viewing procedural effectiveness as idée directrice (directing idea) of EU Law. At the end of the historical circle, the ruling of the German Federal Constitutional Court in Weiss, from the 5th of May 2020, constitutes a great exemplification of the normative clash between the EU procedural rule of law applied in the context of economic emergency by the CJEU and a national judicial vision of the ‘proper’ standard of judicial review to be realized in such a situation. This contribution is divided into three parts. First, it maps the doctrinal debate on EU procedural law. In this section, it views the principle of effectiveness as the core ‘foundational’ norm of procedural rule of law. Second, it analyses the various applications of the procedural rule of law as procedural effectiveness in the CJEU case law by looking at effet utile, national procedural autonomy and effective judicial protection. This is done by tracking the historical roots of procedural effectiveness in the ECSC and CJEU Courts case law. Third, it uses the case law of the CJEU in the recent context of economic emergency as a test case of the application of the procedural rule of law. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
publication status
in press
subject
keywords
EU law, EU-rätt
host publication
Rule of Law in the EU - 30 Years After the Fall of the Berlin Wall
series title
Swedish Studies in European Law
editor
Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, Antonina ; Moberg, Andreas and Nergelius, Joakim
issue
15
publisher
Hart Publishing Ltd
ISBN
9781509941605
9781509941599
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
6565a804-1521-4bfb-9a09-9c5ba3e8e96e
date added to LUP
2021-09-22 16:38:37
date last changed
2022-02-23 13:57:59
@inbook{6565a804-1521-4bfb-9a09-9c5ba3e8e96e,
  abstract     = {{The rule of law in the EU is not only substantive and formal, it is also procedural. From the early years of European integration until now – and this through the interpretative lens of either the terse Article 31 ECSC or the robust Article 19 TEU - the procedural rule of law has always been thriving and jolting in the case law of both the European Coal and Steal Community (ECSC) Court and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Yet, in the last years, the place of the procedural rule of law in the European jurisprudence has increased significantly with the help of the newly drafted Article 19 TEU (replacing Article 220 EC, ex article 164 EEC) and the entry into force of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and notably its Article 47, which incorporates and codifies the general principle of effective judicial protection. Another reason of this contemporary rise of the procedural of law is the present ‘crisis context’ epitomized, for instance, by the state of economic emergency and the bailout case law of the CJEU. Claire Kilpatrick has relied on the concept of the procedural rule of law to show the malfunctioning of the EU judicial and administrative reviews of bailouts. Our contribution builds on her analysis, but is using a broader spectrum of investigation by not focusing merely on the situation of economic emergency and by tracing back the ‘procedural rule of law culture’ of the CJEU. We will inquire, therefore, the historical and normative foundations of the procedural rule of law by studying the roots of effet utile, effectiveness and effective judicial protection in the EU legal order and by viewing procedural effectiveness as idée directrice (directing idea) of EU Law. At the end of the historical circle, the ruling of the German Federal Constitutional Court in Weiss, from the 5th of May 2020, constitutes a great exemplification of the normative clash between the EU procedural rule of law applied in the context of economic emergency by the CJEU and a national judicial vision of the ‘proper’ standard of judicial review to be realized in such a situation. This contribution is divided into three parts. First, it maps the doctrinal debate on EU procedural law. In this section, it views the principle of effectiveness as the core ‘foundational’ norm of procedural rule of law. Second, it analyses the various applications of the procedural rule of law as procedural effectiveness in the CJEU case law by looking at effet utile, national procedural autonomy and effective judicial protection. This is done by tracking the historical roots of procedural effectiveness in the ECSC and CJEU Courts case law. Third, it uses the case law of the CJEU in the recent context of economic emergency as a test case of the application of the procedural rule of law.}},
  author       = {{Groussot, Xavier and Zemskova, Anna}},
  booktitle    = {{Rule of Law in the EU - 30 Years After the Fall of the Berlin Wall}},
  editor       = {{Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, Antonina and Moberg, Andreas and Nergelius, Joakim}},
  isbn         = {{9781509941605}},
  keywords     = {{EU law; EU-rätt}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{12}},
  number       = {{15}},
  publisher    = {{Hart Publishing Ltd}},
  series       = {{Swedish Studies in European Law}},
  title        = {{The Rise of Procedural Rule of Law in the European Union - Historical and Normative Foundations}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}