Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Measuring whole body inert gas wash-out

Plogmark, Oscar LU ; Silvanius, Mårten ; Olsson, Max LU orcid ; Hjelte, Carl LU ; Ekström, Magnus LU orcid and Frånberg, Oskar LU (2023) In Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine 53(4). p.321-326
Abstract

Introduction: Quantifying inert gas wash-out is crucial to understanding the pathophysiology of decompression sickness. In this study, we developed a portable closed-circuit device for measuring inert gas wash-out and validated its precision and accuracy both with and without human subjects. Methods: We developed an exhalate monitor with sensors for volume, temperature, water vapor and oxygen. Inert gas volume was extrapolated from these inputs using the ideal gas law. The device's ability to detect volume differences while connected to a breathing machine was analysed by injecting a given gas volume eight times. One hundred and seventy-two coupled before-and-after measurements were then compared with a paired t-test. Drift in measured... (More)

Introduction: Quantifying inert gas wash-out is crucial to understanding the pathophysiology of decompression sickness. In this study, we developed a portable closed-circuit device for measuring inert gas wash-out and validated its precision and accuracy both with and without human subjects. Methods: We developed an exhalate monitor with sensors for volume, temperature, water vapor and oxygen. Inert gas volume was extrapolated from these inputs using the ideal gas law. The device's ability to detect volume differences while connected to a breathing machine was analysed by injecting a given gas volume eight times. One hundred and seventy-two coupled before-and-after measurements were then compared with a paired t-test. Drift in measured inert gas volume during unlabored breathing was evaluated in three subjects at rest using multilevel linear regression. A quasi-experimental cross-over study with the same subjects was conducted to evaluate the device's ability to detect inert gas changes in relation to diving interventions and simulate power. Results: The difference between the injected volume (1,996 ml) and the device's measured volume (1,986 ml) was -10 ml. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the measured volume was 1,969 to 2,003 ml. Mean drift during a 43 min period of unlaboured breathing was -19 ml, (95% CI, -37 to -1). Our power simulation, based on a cross-over study design, determined a sample size of two subjects to detect a true mean difference of total inert gas wash-out volume of 100 ml. Conclusions: We present a portable device with acceptable precision and accuracy to measure inert gas wash-out differences that may be physiologically relevant in the pathophysiology of decompression sickness.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Decompression sickness, Diving research, Gas kinetics, Nitrogen, Physiology, Pressure
in
Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine
volume
53
issue
4
pages
6 pages
publisher
South Pacific Underwater Med Soc
external identifiers
  • pmid:38091591
  • scopus:85179650414
ISSN
1833-3516
DOI
10.28920/dhm53.4.321-326
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
661394c6-770b-4865-9279-ef0e4aa59c5c
date added to LUP
2024-01-03 13:15:03
date last changed
2024-04-18 10:37:44
@article{661394c6-770b-4865-9279-ef0e4aa59c5c,
  abstract     = {{<p>Introduction: Quantifying inert gas wash-out is crucial to understanding the pathophysiology of decompression sickness. In this study, we developed a portable closed-circuit device for measuring inert gas wash-out and validated its precision and accuracy both with and without human subjects. Methods: We developed an exhalate monitor with sensors for volume, temperature, water vapor and oxygen. Inert gas volume was extrapolated from these inputs using the ideal gas law. The device's ability to detect volume differences while connected to a breathing machine was analysed by injecting a given gas volume eight times. One hundred and seventy-two coupled before-and-after measurements were then compared with a paired t-test. Drift in measured inert gas volume during unlabored breathing was evaluated in three subjects at rest using multilevel linear regression. A quasi-experimental cross-over study with the same subjects was conducted to evaluate the device's ability to detect inert gas changes in relation to diving interventions and simulate power. Results: The difference between the injected volume (1,996 ml) and the device's measured volume (1,986 ml) was -10 ml. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the measured volume was 1,969 to 2,003 ml. Mean drift during a 43 min period of unlaboured breathing was -19 ml, (95% CI, -37 to -1). Our power simulation, based on a cross-over study design, determined a sample size of two subjects to detect a true mean difference of total inert gas wash-out volume of 100 ml. Conclusions: We present a portable device with acceptable precision and accuracy to measure inert gas wash-out differences that may be physiologically relevant in the pathophysiology of decompression sickness.</p>}},
  author       = {{Plogmark, Oscar and Silvanius, Mårten and Olsson, Max and Hjelte, Carl and Ekström, Magnus and Frånberg, Oskar}},
  issn         = {{1833-3516}},
  keywords     = {{Decompression sickness; Diving research; Gas kinetics; Nitrogen; Physiology; Pressure}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{321--326}},
  publisher    = {{South Pacific Underwater Med Soc}},
  series       = {{Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine}},
  title        = {{Measuring whole body inert gas wash-out}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.28920/dhm53.4.321-326}},
  doi          = {{10.28920/dhm53.4.321-326}},
  volume       = {{53}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}