Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Solidarity and polarisation regarding COVID-19 and related risks – A thematic analysis of comments from an international survey.

Stjernswärd, Sigrid LU orcid and Glasdam, Stinne LU (2021) In Social Sciences & Humanities Open 4(1). p.1-9
Abstract
COVID-19 represents a risk to people's life and societies in their current shapes and functions, with institutionalised responses redefining everyday life. Crises in society can induce fear and tensions that can unite and divide people, inducing acts of solidarity and polarisation. The study explored articulations of solidarity and polarisation in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic and related risks. A Foucault-inspired thematic analysis was pursued on qualitative data from an international survey about COVID-19 and social media. The analysis resulted in four themes illustrating articulations of solidarity and polarisation related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The analysis showed solidarity and polarisation as each other's premise and... (More)
COVID-19 represents a risk to people's life and societies in their current shapes and functions, with institutionalised responses redefining everyday life. Crises in society can induce fear and tensions that can unite and divide people, inducing acts of solidarity and polarisation. The study explored articulations of solidarity and polarisation in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic and related risks. A Foucault-inspired thematic analysis was pursued on qualitative data from an international survey about COVID-19 and social media. The analysis resulted in four themes illustrating articulations of solidarity and polarisation related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The analysis showed solidarity and polarisation as each other's premise and contradiction. Socialisation into a ‘new normal’ was characterised by the balance between solidarity and polarisation as well as aspirations to enhance future solidarity. The study illustrated that social media functioned as social technology for control and manipulation towards social normalisation. However, it was also used to voice attempts to rectify (or overthrow) the dominant medico-political discourse and norms with own preferences, opinions and a functioning daily life. In short, the articulations and social media uses could be interpreted as expressions of power and counter-power. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Solidarity, polarisation, COVID-19, Thematic analysis, Foucault, Social media
in
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
volume
4
issue
1
article number
100211
pages
1 - 9
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • pmid:34604736
  • scopus:85150759975
ISSN
2590-2911
DOI
10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100211
project
Social media and COVID-19
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
674303a4-14a7-4f35-9f5a-21e2f19e1acf
date added to LUP
2021-09-30 12:36:45
date last changed
2023-05-22 04:00:57
@article{674303a4-14a7-4f35-9f5a-21e2f19e1acf,
  abstract     = {{COVID-19 represents a risk to people's life and societies in their current shapes and functions, with institutionalised responses redefining everyday life. Crises in society can induce fear and tensions that can unite and divide people, inducing acts of solidarity and polarisation. The study explored articulations of solidarity and polarisation in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic and related risks. A Foucault-inspired thematic analysis was pursued on qualitative data from an international survey about COVID-19 and social media. The analysis resulted in four themes illustrating articulations of solidarity and polarisation related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The analysis showed solidarity and polarisation as each other's premise and contradiction. Socialisation into a ‘new normal’ was characterised by the balance between solidarity and polarisation as well as aspirations to enhance future solidarity. The study illustrated that social media functioned as social technology for control and manipulation towards social normalisation. However, it was also used to voice attempts to rectify (or overthrow) the dominant medico-political discourse and norms with own preferences, opinions and a functioning daily life. In short, the articulations and social media uses could be interpreted as expressions of power and counter-power.}},
  author       = {{Stjernswärd, Sigrid and Glasdam, Stinne}},
  issn         = {{2590-2911}},
  keywords     = {{Solidarity; polarisation; COVID-19; Thematic analysis; Foucault; Social media}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{1--9}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Social Sciences & Humanities Open}},
  title        = {{Solidarity and polarisation regarding COVID-19 and related risks – A thematic analysis of comments from an international survey.}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100211}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100211}},
  volume       = {{4}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}