PSA doubling time predicts the outcome after active surveillance in screening-detected prostate cancer: Results from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Sweden section
(2007) In International Journal of Cancer 120(1). p.170-174- Abstract
- This study reports the outcome of active surveillance in men with PSA screening-detected prostate cancer (PC), and PSA doubling time (PSADT) was evaluated as a predictor of selecting patients to active treatment or surveillance. On December 31, 1994, 10,000 men were randomized to biennial PSA testing. Through to December 2004, a total of 660 men were diagnosed with PC, of whom 270 managed with initial surveillance. Of these 270 patients, 104 (39%) received active treatment during follow-up, 70 radical prostatectomy, 24 radiation and 10 endocrine treatment. Those who received active treatment during follow-up (mean 63 months) were significantly younger (62.6 vs. 65.5 years, p < 0.0001) and had a shorter PSADT (3.7 vs. 12 years, p <... (More)
- This study reports the outcome of active surveillance in men with PSA screening-detected prostate cancer (PC), and PSA doubling time (PSADT) was evaluated as a predictor of selecting patients to active treatment or surveillance. On December 31, 1994, 10,000 men were randomized to biennial PSA testing. Through to December 2004, a total of 660 men were diagnosed with PC, of whom 270 managed with initial surveillance. Of these 270 patients, 104 (39%) received active treatment during follow-up, 70 radical prostatectomy, 24 radiation and 10 endocrine treatment. Those who received active treatment during follow-up (mean 63 months) were significantly younger (62.6 vs. 65.5 years, p < 0.0001) and had a shorter PSADT (3.7 vs. 12 years, p < 0.0001). PSA relapse was observed in 9 of 70 patients who received RRP during a mean follow-up of 37 months. Seven of these nine PSA relapses were in the patients with preoperative PSADT < 2 years. None of the 37 operated patients with a PSADT > 4 years had a PSA relapse. In a Cox regression analysis adjusted for PSA, ratio-free PSA and amount of cancer in biopsy, only the preoperative PSADT was statistically significant predictor of PSA relapse in p = 0.031. The optimal candidate for surveillance is a man with early, low-grade, low-stage PC and a PSADT > 4 years. In younger men with a PSADT of less than 4 years, surveillance does not seem to be a justified alternative, and patient should be informed about the risk with such an approach. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/683695
- author
- Ali, Khatami ; Gunnar, Aus ; Jan-Erik, Damber ; Lilja, Hans LU ; Par, Lodding and Jonas, Hugosson
- organization
- publishing date
- 2007
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- radical prostatectomy, PSA doubling time, prostate cancer, surveillance
- in
- International Journal of Cancer
- volume
- 120
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 170 - 174
- publisher
- John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000242653300024
- pmid:17013897
- scopus:33845466234
- ISSN
- 0020-7136
- DOI
- 10.1002/ijc.22161
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 9c5214c0-ba64-4b7a-ab17-67b9dcd94e33 (old id 683695)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 12:17:02
- date last changed
- 2022-12-09 08:22:05
@article{9c5214c0-ba64-4b7a-ab17-67b9dcd94e33, abstract = {{This study reports the outcome of active surveillance in men with PSA screening-detected prostate cancer (PC), and PSA doubling time (PSADT) was evaluated as a predictor of selecting patients to active treatment or surveillance. On December 31, 1994, 10,000 men were randomized to biennial PSA testing. Through to December 2004, a total of 660 men were diagnosed with PC, of whom 270 managed with initial surveillance. Of these 270 patients, 104 (39%) received active treatment during follow-up, 70 radical prostatectomy, 24 radiation and 10 endocrine treatment. Those who received active treatment during follow-up (mean 63 months) were significantly younger (62.6 vs. 65.5 years, p < 0.0001) and had a shorter PSADT (3.7 vs. 12 years, p < 0.0001). PSA relapse was observed in 9 of 70 patients who received RRP during a mean follow-up of 37 months. Seven of these nine PSA relapses were in the patients with preoperative PSADT < 2 years. None of the 37 operated patients with a PSADT > 4 years had a PSA relapse. In a Cox regression analysis adjusted for PSA, ratio-free PSA and amount of cancer in biopsy, only the preoperative PSADT was statistically significant predictor of PSA relapse in p = 0.031. The optimal candidate for surveillance is a man with early, low-grade, low-stage PC and a PSADT > 4 years. In younger men with a PSADT of less than 4 years, surveillance does not seem to be a justified alternative, and patient should be informed about the risk with such an approach. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.}}, author = {{Ali, Khatami and Gunnar, Aus and Jan-Erik, Damber and Lilja, Hans and Par, Lodding and Jonas, Hugosson}}, issn = {{0020-7136}}, keywords = {{radical prostatectomy; PSA doubling time; prostate cancer; surveillance}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{170--174}}, publisher = {{John Wiley & Sons Inc.}}, series = {{International Journal of Cancer}}, title = {{PSA doubling time predicts the outcome after active surveillance in screening-detected prostate cancer: Results from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Sweden section}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.22161}}, doi = {{10.1002/ijc.22161}}, volume = {{120}}, year = {{2007}}, }