Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Comparativism and the grounds for person-centered care and shared decision making

Herlitz, Anders LU (2017) In Journal of Clinical Ethics 28(4). p.269-278
Abstract
This article provides a new argument and a new value-theoretical ground for person-centered care and shared decision making that ascribes to it the role of enabling rational choice in situations involving clinical choice. Rather than referring to good health outcomes and/or ethical grounds such as patient autonomy, it argues that a plausible justification and ground for person-centered care and shared decision making is preservation of rationality in the face of comparative non-determinacy in clinical settings. Often, no alternative treatment will be better than or equal to every other alternative. In the face of such comparative non-determinacy, Ruth Chang has argued that we can make rational decisions by invoking reasons that are created... (More)
This article provides a new argument and a new value-theoretical ground for person-centered care and shared decision making that ascribes to it the role of enabling rational choice in situations involving clinical choice. Rather than referring to good health outcomes and/or ethical grounds such as patient autonomy, it argues that a plausible justification and ground for person-centered care and shared decision making is preservation of rationality in the face of comparative non-determinacy in clinical settings. Often, no alternative treatment will be better than or equal to every other alternative. In the face of such comparative non-determinacy, Ruth Chang has argued that we can make rational decisions by invoking reasons that are created through acts of willing. This article transfers this view to clinical decision making and argues that shared decision making provides a solution to non-determinacy problems in clinical settings. This view of the role of shared decision making provides a new understanding of its nature, and it also allows us to better understand when caregivers should engage in shared decision making and when they should not. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Journal of Clinical Ethics
volume
28
issue
4
pages
269 - 278
publisher
University of Chicago Press
external identifiers
  • scopus:85047644638
ISSN
1046-7890
DOI
10.1086/JCE2017284269
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
69a5a43a-b984-40bc-985e-9103ded000fd
date added to LUP
2024-12-10 14:57:49
date last changed
2025-04-04 15:04:25
@article{69a5a43a-b984-40bc-985e-9103ded000fd,
  abstract     = {{This article provides a new argument and a new value-theoretical ground for person-centered care and shared decision making that ascribes to it the role of enabling rational choice in situations involving clinical choice. Rather than referring to good health outcomes and/or ethical grounds such as patient autonomy, it argues that a plausible justification and ground for person-centered care and shared decision making is preservation of rationality in the face of comparative non-determinacy in clinical settings. Often, no alternative treatment will be better than or equal to every other alternative. In the face of such comparative non-determinacy, Ruth Chang has argued that we can make rational decisions by invoking reasons that are created through acts of willing. This article transfers this view to clinical decision making and argues that shared decision making provides a solution to non-determinacy problems in clinical settings. This view of the role of shared decision making provides a new understanding of its nature, and it also allows us to better understand when caregivers should engage in shared decision making and when they should not.}},
  author       = {{Herlitz, Anders}},
  issn         = {{1046-7890}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{269--278}},
  publisher    = {{University of Chicago Press}},
  series       = {{Journal of Clinical Ethics}},
  title        = {{Comparativism and the grounds for person-centered care and shared decision making}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/JCE2017284269}},
  doi          = {{10.1086/JCE2017284269}},
  volume       = {{28}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}