Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Stable isotope and geochronological study of the Mawchi Sn-W deposit, Myanmar : Implications for timing of mineralization and ore genesis

Myint, Aung Zaw ; Yonezu, Kotaro ; Boyce, Adrian J. ; Selby, David ; Scherstén, Anders LU ; Tindell, Thomas ; Watanabe, Koichiro and Swe, Ye Myint (2018) In Ore Geology Reviews 95. p.663-679
Abstract

Myanmar is endowed with abundant Sn-W mineralization, pre-eminent amongst which is the world-class Mawchi deposit. In the Mawchi area, N-S trending vertical or steeply dipping quartz veins are hosted by both Eocene granite and Carboniferous to Early Permian metasediments. Three stages of ore formation are recognized; (i) tourmaline-cassiterite stage (ii) main ore stage and (iii) sulfide stage. Tourmaline, cassiterite and pyrite-I are early-formed minerals and are representative of the first stage. Their deposition continued together with wolframite, scheelite, molybdenite, arsenopyrite, pyrite-II, fluorite and danalite, which form the second stage. This was followed by the successive deposition of sulfides such as chalcopyrite,... (More)

Myanmar is endowed with abundant Sn-W mineralization, pre-eminent amongst which is the world-class Mawchi deposit. In the Mawchi area, N-S trending vertical or steeply dipping quartz veins are hosted by both Eocene granite and Carboniferous to Early Permian metasediments. Three stages of ore formation are recognized; (i) tourmaline-cassiterite stage (ii) main ore stage and (iii) sulfide stage. Tourmaline, cassiterite and pyrite-I are early-formed minerals and are representative of the first stage. Their deposition continued together with wolframite, scheelite, molybdenite, arsenopyrite, pyrite-II, fluorite and danalite, which form the second stage. This was followed by the successive deposition of sulfides such as chalcopyrite, sphalerite, galena and Pb-Bi sulfides. A 40Ar/39Ar magmatic biotite plateau age of 41.50 ± 0.16 Ma (MSWD = 2.5) is determined for the Mawchi biotite granite which we interpret as the time the granite cooled through the biotite blocking temperature, and is consistent with a previously reported LA-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon concordia age of 42.72 ± 0.94 Ma (MSWD = 2). A molybdenite Re-Os model age of 42.4 ± 1.2 Ma indicates that Sn-W mineralization was synchronous with late Eocene granitic magmatism. Our 40Ar/39Ar hydrothermal muscovite plateau ages from the tourmaline granite (40.14 ± 0.14 Ma; MSWD = 1.48) and quartz vein selvages (40.80 ± 0.12 Ma; MSWD = 0.47) define the timing of hydrothermal alteration and simultaneous veining that accompanied the late stage of ore forming at Mawchi. Fluid inclusion microthermometry from cassiterite, scheelite, quartz, and fluorite reveals that ore fluids in the cassiterite-tourmaline stage and main ore stage are characterized by moderate homogenization temperatures (Th = 260–345 °C) and salinities (4.5–15.7 wt% NaCl equiv), while the sulfide stage is characterized by lower temperatures (Th = 175–260 °C) and moderate to low salinity (2.5–13 wt% NaCl equiv). The mean δ34S of all sulfides is 2.9 ± 2.9‰ which is suggestive that the overall system is dominated by magmatic sulfur. The similarity of δ34S values in galena and Pb-Bi sulfides (−1.3 to 2.7‰) suggest that sulfur, and inference the Pb and Bi were transported by a common fluid, probably of magmatic origin. The calculated δ18OH2O of the hydrothermal fluid associated with cassiterite and tourmaline is 7.3–8.4‰. Scheelite and quartz deposition is characterized by lighter δ18OH2O values (2.1–4.9‰) indicating that the ore fluid might be mixed with another source of water, perhaps, meteoric. Hydrogen isotopic compositions (δD = −51 to −121‰) again indicate that origin of the ore fluid is magmatic, but δD (∼−120‰) is low enough to support the δ18OH2O data that suggests, in part, a meteoric water component to the hydrothermal fluids at Mawchi.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Geochronology, Mawchi, Ore genesis, Sn-W, Stable isotope, Timing
in
Ore Geology Reviews
volume
95
pages
17 pages
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85044459656
ISSN
0169-1368
DOI
10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.03.014
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
6bf035e2-3b6d-4b6d-86bc-da7be2b48d57
date added to LUP
2018-05-07 14:43:56
date last changed
2022-03-25 01:37:55
@article{6bf035e2-3b6d-4b6d-86bc-da7be2b48d57,
  abstract     = {{<p>Myanmar is endowed with abundant Sn-W mineralization, pre-eminent amongst which is the world-class Mawchi deposit. In the Mawchi area, N-S trending vertical or steeply dipping quartz veins are hosted by both Eocene granite and Carboniferous to Early Permian metasediments. Three stages of ore formation are recognized; (i) tourmaline-cassiterite stage (ii) main ore stage and (iii) sulfide stage. Tourmaline, cassiterite and pyrite-I are early-formed minerals and are representative of the first stage. Their deposition continued together with wolframite, scheelite, molybdenite, arsenopyrite, pyrite-II, fluorite and danalite, which form the second stage. This was followed by the successive deposition of sulfides such as chalcopyrite, sphalerite, galena and Pb-Bi sulfides. A <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar magmatic biotite plateau age of 41.50 ± 0.16 Ma (MSWD = 2.5) is determined for the Mawchi biotite granite which we interpret as the time the granite cooled through the biotite blocking temperature, and is consistent with a previously reported LA-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon concordia age of 42.72 ± 0.94 Ma (MSWD = 2). A molybdenite Re-Os model age of 42.4 ± 1.2 Ma indicates that Sn-W mineralization was synchronous with late Eocene granitic magmatism. Our <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar hydrothermal muscovite plateau ages from the tourmaline granite (40.14 ± 0.14 Ma; MSWD = 1.48) and quartz vein selvages (40.80 ± 0.12 Ma; MSWD = 0.47) define the timing of hydrothermal alteration and simultaneous veining that accompanied the late stage of ore forming at Mawchi. Fluid inclusion microthermometry from cassiterite, scheelite, quartz, and fluorite reveals that ore fluids in the cassiterite-tourmaline stage and main ore stage are characterized by moderate homogenization temperatures (Th = 260–345 °C) and salinities (4.5–15.7 wt% NaCl equiv), while the sulfide stage is characterized by lower temperatures (Th = 175–260 °C) and moderate to low salinity (2.5–13 wt% NaCl equiv). The mean δ<sup>34</sup>S of all sulfides is 2.9 ± 2.9‰ which is suggestive that the overall system is dominated by magmatic sulfur. The similarity of δ<sup>34</sup>S values in galena and Pb-Bi sulfides (−1.3 to 2.7‰) suggest that sulfur, and inference the Pb and Bi were transported by a common fluid, probably of magmatic origin. The calculated δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>H2O</sub> of the hydrothermal fluid associated with cassiterite and tourmaline is 7.3–8.4‰. Scheelite and quartz deposition is characterized by lighter δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>H2O</sub> values (2.1–4.9‰) indicating that the ore fluid might be mixed with another source of water, perhaps, meteoric. Hydrogen isotopic compositions (δD = −51 to −121‰) again indicate that origin of the ore fluid is magmatic, but δD (∼−120‰) is low enough to support the δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>H2O</sub> data that suggests, in part, a meteoric water component to the hydrothermal fluids at Mawchi.</p>}},
  author       = {{Myint, Aung Zaw and Yonezu, Kotaro and Boyce, Adrian J. and Selby, David and Scherstén, Anders and Tindell, Thomas and Watanabe, Koichiro and Swe, Ye Myint}},
  issn         = {{0169-1368}},
  keywords     = {{Geochronology; Mawchi; Ore genesis; Sn-W; Stable isotope; Timing}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{04}},
  pages        = {{663--679}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Ore Geology Reviews}},
  title        = {{Stable isotope and geochronological study of the Mawchi Sn-W deposit, Myanmar : Implications for timing of mineralization and ore genesis}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.03.014}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.03.014}},
  volume       = {{95}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}