A Mixed Method Pilot Feasibility Study of a Symptom Management Support Intervention for Heart Transplant Recipients With Chronic Pain and Extensive Symptom Distress
(2025) In Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 39(1).- Abstract
Background: The aim of heart transplantation is prolonged survival and improved quality of life. Chronic pain is a common and distressing symptom after heart transplantation. To our knowledge, there are no person-centred interventions aimed at chronic pain and symptom distress after heart transplantation. The aim was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of systematic, person-centred symptom management support for heart recipients with chronic pain to reduce symptom distress. Methods: A mixed method prospective pilot feasibility study. A one-group, pre-test/post-test design examined the effect of a symptom management support intervention by means of three consecutive 1-h person-centred supportive conversations about the heart... (More)
Background: The aim of heart transplantation is prolonged survival and improved quality of life. Chronic pain is a common and distressing symptom after heart transplantation. To our knowledge, there are no person-centred interventions aimed at chronic pain and symptom distress after heart transplantation. The aim was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of systematic, person-centred symptom management support for heart recipients with chronic pain to reduce symptom distress. Methods: A mixed method prospective pilot feasibility study. A one-group, pre-test/post-test design examined the effect of a symptom management support intervention by means of three consecutive 1-h person-centred supportive conversations about the heart recipient's experienced ability to manage her or his symptoms, self-efficacy and transplant-specific well-being. In total, 13 participants completed the intervention, 7 women and 6 men, with a mean age of 54.38 years. The feasibility was evaluated by semi-structured interviews analysed after the intervention in accordance with phenomenological hermeneutics, while four different instruments were used to quantitatively evaluate pain, self-efficacy, person-centeredness and transplant-specific well-being both before and after the intervention. Results: The intervention constituted a profound experience of being taken seriously based on four themes. The heart recipients experienced both sameness and otherness through reduced asymmetry in the caring encounter; thus, their dignity as persons capable of interpreting their own health was restored. Transplant-specific well-being improved clinically after the intervention, while basic activities of daily life improved significantly (p = 0.014). Although there was no change in self-efficacy, the self-rated experience of being taken seriously improved. There was a moderate relationship between transplant-specific well-being and self-efficacy before the intervention, rho 0.52 (p = 0.066) and a strong relationship after the intervention, rho 0.84 (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Three 1-h consecutive person-centred conversations to support symptom management after heart transplantation constitute a relevant, feasible and effective intervention.
(Less)
- author
- Dalvindt, Marita
LU
; Lindahl-Veungen, Hannah
LU
; Kisch, Annika
LU
; Nozohoor, Shahab
LU
and Forsberg, Anna
LU
- organization
-
- Care in high technological environments (research group)
- LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre
- Thoracic Surgery
- Bleeding disorders and acute typ-A dissection (research group)
- Minimal invasive cardiac surgery in valvular heart disease (research group)
- Neurological injury in acute type A aortic dissection (research group)
- publishing date
- 2025-03
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- chronic pain, feasibility study, heart transplantation, intervention, mixed method design, person-centred care
- in
- Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
- volume
- 39
- issue
- 1
- article number
- e70022
- publisher
- Wiley-Blackwell
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:105000424224
- pmid:40087829
- ISSN
- 0283-9318
- DOI
- 10.1111/scs.70022
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 6d02e57d-adb4-48bb-8fdc-35e7b6a78871
- date added to LUP
- 2025-12-19 12:40:23
- date last changed
- 2025-12-20 03:34:37
@article{6d02e57d-adb4-48bb-8fdc-35e7b6a78871,
abstract = {{<p>Background: The aim of heart transplantation is prolonged survival and improved quality of life. Chronic pain is a common and distressing symptom after heart transplantation. To our knowledge, there are no person-centred interventions aimed at chronic pain and symptom distress after heart transplantation. The aim was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of systematic, person-centred symptom management support for heart recipients with chronic pain to reduce symptom distress. Methods: A mixed method prospective pilot feasibility study. A one-group, pre-test/post-test design examined the effect of a symptom management support intervention by means of three consecutive 1-h person-centred supportive conversations about the heart recipient's experienced ability to manage her or his symptoms, self-efficacy and transplant-specific well-being. In total, 13 participants completed the intervention, 7 women and 6 men, with a mean age of 54.38 years. The feasibility was evaluated by semi-structured interviews analysed after the intervention in accordance with phenomenological hermeneutics, while four different instruments were used to quantitatively evaluate pain, self-efficacy, person-centeredness and transplant-specific well-being both before and after the intervention. Results: The intervention constituted a profound experience of being taken seriously based on four themes. The heart recipients experienced both sameness and otherness through reduced asymmetry in the caring encounter; thus, their dignity as persons capable of interpreting their own health was restored. Transplant-specific well-being improved clinically after the intervention, while basic activities of daily life improved significantly (p = 0.014). Although there was no change in self-efficacy, the self-rated experience of being taken seriously improved. There was a moderate relationship between transplant-specific well-being and self-efficacy before the intervention, rho 0.52 (p = 0.066) and a strong relationship after the intervention, rho 0.84 (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Three 1-h consecutive person-centred conversations to support symptom management after heart transplantation constitute a relevant, feasible and effective intervention.</p>}},
author = {{Dalvindt, Marita and Lindahl-Veungen, Hannah and Kisch, Annika and Nozohoor, Shahab and Forsberg, Anna}},
issn = {{0283-9318}},
keywords = {{chronic pain; feasibility study; heart transplantation; intervention; mixed method design; person-centred care}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1}},
publisher = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
series = {{Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences}},
title = {{A Mixed Method Pilot Feasibility Study of a Symptom Management Support Intervention for Heart Transplant Recipients With Chronic Pain and Extensive Symptom Distress}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/scs.70022}},
doi = {{10.1111/scs.70022}},
volume = {{39}},
year = {{2025}},
}