Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Causal Grounds for Negative Truths

Stenwall, Robin LU (2017) In Philosophical Studies 174(12). p.2973-2989
Abstract
Among truthmaker theorists it is generally thought that we are not able to use the entailment principle (i.e. the principle according to which truthmaking distributes across entailment) to ground negative truths. But these theorists usually only discuss truthmakers for truth-functional complexes, thereby overlooking the fact that there are non-truth-functional complexes whose truth values are not solely determined by the truth or falsity of their atomic propositions. And once we expand the class of truths that require their own bespoke truthmakers to also include these, there is no reason to exempt negative truths from grounding. For given that truthmaking is closed under entailment and every negative truths is entailed by some... (More)
Among truthmaker theorists it is generally thought that we are not able to use the entailment principle (i.e. the principle according to which truthmaking distributes across entailment) to ground negative truths. But these theorists usually only discuss truthmakers for truth-functional complexes, thereby overlooking the fact that there are non-truth-functional complexes whose truth values are not solely determined by the truth or falsity of their atomic propositions. And once we expand the class of truths that require their own bespoke truthmakers to also include these, there is no reason to exempt negative truths from grounding. For given that truthmaking is closed under entailment and every negative truths is entailed by some non-truth-functional complex or other, any resources rich enough to ground the truth of the latter will do the same job for the former. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Philosophical Studies
volume
174
issue
12
pages
2973 - 2989
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • scopus:85001084882
  • wos:000413603900004
ISSN
0031-8116
DOI
10.1007/s11098-016-0841-x
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
6df86f64-42f4-42d2-a7f5-e5a9a2d1b3ba
date added to LUP
2016-11-30 10:04:36
date last changed
2022-02-14 07:04:21
@article{6df86f64-42f4-42d2-a7f5-e5a9a2d1b3ba,
  abstract     = {{Among truthmaker theorists it is generally thought that we are not able to use the entailment principle (i.e. the principle according to which truthmaking distributes across entailment) to ground negative truths. But these theorists usually only discuss truthmakers for truth-functional complexes, thereby overlooking the fact that there are non-truth-functional complexes whose truth values are not solely determined by the truth or falsity of their atomic propositions. And once we expand the class of truths that require their own bespoke truthmakers to also include these, there is no reason to exempt negative truths from grounding. For given that truthmaking is closed under entailment and every negative truths is entailed by some non-truth-functional complex or other, any resources rich enough to ground the truth of the latter will do the same job for the former.}},
  author       = {{Stenwall, Robin}},
  issn         = {{0031-8116}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{12}},
  pages        = {{2973--2989}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{Philosophical Studies}},
  title        = {{Causal Grounds for Negative Truths}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0841-x}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11098-016-0841-x}},
  volume       = {{174}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}