Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Perioperative systemic chemotherapy in peritoneal carcinomatosis of lymph node positive colorectal cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Kuijpers, A M ; Mehta, A M ; Boot, H ; van Leerdam, M E ; Hauptmann, M ; Aalbers, A G and Verwaal, V J LU (2014) In Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology 25(4). p.864-869
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is the preferred treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal carcinoma. Patients with positive lymph node status have worse survival after CRS-HIPEC, which is probably due to higher rates of systemic failure. In this study, we analysed the effect of administration and timing of systemic chemotherapy on the outcome of lymph node positive colorectal carcinoma patients treated with CRS-HIPEC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective database was reviewed to identify lymph node positive patients with PC treated with CRS-HIPEC within 1 year after primary tumour diagnosis between 2004 and 2012. Medical history of the patients was studied... (More)

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is the preferred treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal carcinoma. Patients with positive lymph node status have worse survival after CRS-HIPEC, which is probably due to higher rates of systemic failure. In this study, we analysed the effect of administration and timing of systemic chemotherapy on the outcome of lymph node positive colorectal carcinoma patients treated with CRS-HIPEC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective database was reviewed to identify lymph node positive patients with PC treated with CRS-HIPEC within 1 year after primary tumour diagnosis between 2004 and 2012. Medical history of the patients was studied for the administration of perioperative systemic chemotherapy and follow-up. Outcome parameters were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and pattern of recurrence.

RESULTS: Seventy-three patients treated with CRS-HIPEC for PC from lymph node positive colorectal carcinoma were identified. Fourteen patients received pre-CRS-HIPEC chemotherapy only, 32 patients underwent post-CRS-HIPEC chemotherapy only, 9 patients received chemotherapy both pre- and post-CRS-HIPEC and 16 patients did not receive any systemic chemotherapy. Of the 47 patients who did not receive pre-CRS-HIPEC chemotherapy, 11 (23%) did not receive any chemotherapy due to major postoperative complications. PFS and OS were significantly higher in patients who received systemic chemotherapy (PFS: median 15 versus 4 months, P = 0.024; OS: median 30 versus 14 months, P = 0.015), although this difference was attenuated after adjustment for major complications. Different chemotherapy timings did not differ significantly in either survival or recurrence patterns.

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PC from lymph node positive colorectal carcinoma, perioperative systemic chemotherapy is associated with increased OS and PFS, although this difference may be partly explained by the occurrence of major postoperative complication; with no evidence of difference in PFS, OS and systemic recurrence rate by timing of systemic chemotherapy.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; and
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Adult, Aged, Carcinoma/drug therapy, Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion, Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy, Combined Modality Therapy, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Humans, Hyperthermia, Induced, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Lymph Nodes/drug effects, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy, Perioperative Care, Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy
in
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
volume
25
issue
4
pages
6 pages
publisher
Oxford University Press
external identifiers
  • scopus:84897056482
  • pmid:24667719
ISSN
1569-8041
DOI
10.1093/annonc/mdu031
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
70f4ab68-36b6-4801-a7fd-e639309a6c44
date added to LUP
2022-04-05 09:44:54
date last changed
2024-04-10 04:38:19
@article{70f4ab68-36b6-4801-a7fd-e639309a6c44,
  abstract     = {{<p>BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is the preferred treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal carcinoma. Patients with positive lymph node status have worse survival after CRS-HIPEC, which is probably due to higher rates of systemic failure. In this study, we analysed the effect of administration and timing of systemic chemotherapy on the outcome of lymph node positive colorectal carcinoma patients treated with CRS-HIPEC.</p><p>PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective database was reviewed to identify lymph node positive patients with PC treated with CRS-HIPEC within 1 year after primary tumour diagnosis between 2004 and 2012. Medical history of the patients was studied for the administration of perioperative systemic chemotherapy and follow-up. Outcome parameters were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and pattern of recurrence.</p><p>RESULTS: Seventy-three patients treated with CRS-HIPEC for PC from lymph node positive colorectal carcinoma were identified. Fourteen patients received pre-CRS-HIPEC chemotherapy only, 32 patients underwent post-CRS-HIPEC chemotherapy only, 9 patients received chemotherapy both pre- and post-CRS-HIPEC and 16 patients did not receive any systemic chemotherapy. Of the 47 patients who did not receive pre-CRS-HIPEC chemotherapy, 11 (23%) did not receive any chemotherapy due to major postoperative complications. PFS and OS were significantly higher in patients who received systemic chemotherapy (PFS: median 15 versus 4 months, P = 0.024; OS: median 30 versus 14 months, P = 0.015), although this difference was attenuated after adjustment for major complications. Different chemotherapy timings did not differ significantly in either survival or recurrence patterns.</p><p>CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PC from lymph node positive colorectal carcinoma, perioperative systemic chemotherapy is associated with increased OS and PFS, although this difference may be partly explained by the occurrence of major postoperative complication; with no evidence of difference in PFS, OS and systemic recurrence rate by timing of systemic chemotherapy.</p>}},
  author       = {{Kuijpers, A M and Mehta, A M and Boot, H and van Leerdam, M E and Hauptmann, M and Aalbers, A G and Verwaal, V J}},
  issn         = {{1569-8041}},
  keywords     = {{Adult; Aged; Carcinoma/drug therapy; Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion; Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy; Combined Modality Therapy; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Hyperthermia, Induced; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lymph Nodes/drug effects; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy; Perioperative Care; Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{864--869}},
  publisher    = {{Oxford University Press}},
  series       = {{Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology}},
  title        = {{Perioperative systemic chemotherapy in peritoneal carcinomatosis of lymph node positive colorectal cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu031}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/annonc/mdu031}},
  volume       = {{25}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}