Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Exploring attitudes toward acceptability of harm reduction : A comparative study of South African and Swedish addiction care professionals.

Geyer, Stephan and Larsson Lindahl, Marianne LU orcid (2026) In Journal of Substance Use
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background and Objective: Working from a harm reduction (HR) approach underscores that addiction
care professionals (ACPs) serve people with substance use disorder in a non-judgmental environment,
encouraging people to seek intervention without abstinence as the ultimate goal. This study aims to
explore and compare the attitudes toward the acceptability of harm reduction among ACPs in South
Africa and Sweden.
Methods: Participants (N = 208), 84 in South Africa and 124 in Sweden, were recruited through non-
probability sampling, via gatekeepers. Data collection comprised a web-based survey with Goddard’s
Harm Reduction Acceptability Scale. Analysis included independent samples t-tests. Cronbach’s... (More)
ABSTRACT
Background and Objective: Working from a harm reduction (HR) approach underscores that addiction
care professionals (ACPs) serve people with substance use disorder in a non-judgmental environment,
encouraging people to seek intervention without abstinence as the ultimate goal. This study aims to
explore and compare the attitudes toward the acceptability of harm reduction among ACPs in South
Africa and Sweden.
Methods: Participants (N = 208), 84 in South Africa and 124 in Sweden, were recruited through non-
probability sampling, via gatekeepers. Data collection comprised a web-based survey with Goddard’s
Harm Reduction Acceptability Scale. Analysis included independent samples t-tests. Cronbach’s alpha
coefficients showed good reliability.
Results: The Swedish ACPs demonstrated significantly greater acceptance of harm reduction than their
South African counterparts (M = 4.03vs 3.47, t(206)=−8.56, p < .001, d = 1.21). The difference was significant
across 18 of the survey’s 25 items, with Swedish ACPs consistently reporting higher attitudes toward
HR acceptance. Most ACPs in both countries were positive about attending HR training.
Conclusions: South African ACPs hold a more negative attitude toward HR than their Swedish counterparts.
Zooming in on specific items of the scale, several practical implications for policymakers and
practitioners in addiction treatment and public health are outlined. (Less)
Abstract (Swedish)
ABSTRACT
Background and Objective: Working from a harm reduction (HR) approach underscores that addiction care professionals (ACPs) serve people with substance use disorder in a non-judgmental environment, encouraging people to seek intervention without abstinence as the ultimate goal. This study aims to
explore and compare the attitudes toward the acceptability of harm reduction among ACPs in South Africa and Sweden.
Methods: Participants (N = 208), 84 in South Africa and 124 in Sweden, were recruited through non-probability sampling, via gatekeepers. Data collection comprised a web-based survey with Goddard’s Harm Reduction Acceptability Scale. Analysis included independent samples t-tests. Cronbach’s alpha
coefficients... (More)
ABSTRACT
Background and Objective: Working from a harm reduction (HR) approach underscores that addiction care professionals (ACPs) serve people with substance use disorder in a non-judgmental environment, encouraging people to seek intervention without abstinence as the ultimate goal. This study aims to
explore and compare the attitudes toward the acceptability of harm reduction among ACPs in South Africa and Sweden.
Methods: Participants (N = 208), 84 in South Africa and 124 in Sweden, were recruited through non-probability sampling, via gatekeepers. Data collection comprised a web-based survey with Goddard’s Harm Reduction Acceptability Scale. Analysis included independent samples t-tests. Cronbach’s alpha
coefficients showed good reliability.
Results: The Swedish ACPs demonstrated significantly greater acceptance of harm reduction than their South African counterparts (M = 4.03vs 3.47, t(206)=−8.56, p < .001, d = 1.21). The difference was significant across 18 of the survey’s 25 items, with Swedish ACPs consistently reporting higher attitudes toward HR acceptance. Most ACPs in both countries were positive about attending HR training.
Conclusions: South African ACPs hold a more negative attitude toward HR than their Swedish counterparts. Zooming in on specific items of the scale, several practical implications for policymakers and practitioners in addiction treatment and public health are outlined. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
epub
subject
keywords
Harm reduction, Substance use disorder, Addiction Care Professionals, Harm Reduction Acceptability Scale, South Africa, Sweden
in
Journal of Substance Use
pages
7 pages
publisher
Taylor & Francis
ISSN
1465-9891
DOI
10.1080/14659891.2026.2685545
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
7232acf4-7629-45e6-b9f4-0239fdbdfc2a
date added to LUP
2026-06-23 12:59:27
date last changed
2026-06-30 12:44:29
@article{7232acf4-7629-45e6-b9f4-0239fdbdfc2a,
  abstract     = {{ABSTRACT<br/>Background and Objective: Working from a harm reduction (HR) approach underscores that addiction<br/>care professionals (ACPs) serve people with substance use disorder in a non-judgmental environment,<br/>encouraging people to seek intervention without abstinence as the ultimate goal. This study aims to<br/>explore and compare the attitudes toward the acceptability of harm reduction among ACPs in South<br/>Africa and Sweden.<br/>Methods: Participants (N = 208), 84 in South Africa and 124 in Sweden, were recruited through non-<br/>probability sampling, via gatekeepers. Data collection comprised a web-based survey with Goddard’s<br/>Harm Reduction Acceptability Scale. Analysis included independent samples t-tests. Cronbach’s alpha<br/>coefficients showed good reliability.<br/>Results: The Swedish ACPs demonstrated significantly greater acceptance of harm reduction than their<br/>South African counterparts (M = 4.03vs 3.47, t(206)=−8.56, p &lt; .001, d = 1.21). The difference was significant<br/>across 18 of the survey’s 25 items, with Swedish ACPs consistently reporting higher attitudes toward<br/>HR acceptance. Most ACPs in both countries were positive about attending HR training.<br/>Conclusions: South African ACPs hold a more negative attitude toward HR than their Swedish counterparts.<br/>Zooming in on specific items of the scale, several practical implications for policymakers and<br/>practitioners in addiction treatment and public health are outlined.}},
  author       = {{Geyer, Stephan and Larsson Lindahl, Marianne}},
  issn         = {{1465-9891}},
  keywords     = {{Harm reduction; Substance use disorder; Addiction Care Professionals; Harm Reduction Acceptability Scale; South Africa; Sweden}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{06}},
  publisher    = {{Taylor & Francis}},
  series       = {{Journal of Substance Use}},
  title        = {{Exploring attitudes toward acceptability of harm reduction : A comparative study of South African and Swedish addiction care professionals.}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2026.2685545}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/14659891.2026.2685545}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}